SnodlandDitton

Snodit one
Not verified

Slow Way not verified yet. Verify Snodit here.

By a Slow Ways Volunteer on 07 Apr 2021


Distance

6km/3mi

Ascent

58m

Descent

41m

Download this route

Are you sure you want to download this route?

Using a GPX file for the first time?

No, back to route

Give a hike

Pledge to walk this route and help firm up its place in the network - every walk helps.

So far it has been reviewed by one person and surveyed by zero people and there is one issue flagged with this route.

One person has pledged to review this route.

Your pledged routes will show up in your pledges Waylist.

Every review and survey pledged and then walked will help make the Slow Ways network better, thank you for your help!

Sign up or log in to pledge to walk this route.

Back to route

Save to Waylist

Sign up or log in to save this route so you can find it more easily or plan a longer journey.

More options

Save to my account

Sign up or log in to save this route so you can find it more easily or plan a longer journey.

Print (via Inkatlas)

Survey this route

Review this route

Suggest a better route

Report a problem

Description

This is a Slow Ways route connecting Snodland and Ditton.

Know of a better route? Share it here.

This is a Slow Ways route connecting Snodland and Ditton.

Know of a better route? Share it here.

Status

This route has been reviewed by 1 person.

This route has been flagged (1 times) for reasons relating to accuracy.

Photos for Snodit one

Photos of this route will appear when they are added to a review. You can review this route here.


Information

Not verified

Route status - Live

Reviews - 1

Average rating -

Is this route good enough? -  No (1)

Problems reported -  Accuracy (1)

Downloads - 5

Surveys

We are working to build-up a picture of what routes look like. To do that we are asking volunteers to survey routes so that we can communicate features, obstacles and challenges that may make a route desirable or not.

Slow Ways surveyors are asked to complete some basic online training, but they are not vetted. If you are dependent on the survey information being correct in order to complete a route, we recommend that you think critically about the information provided. You may also wish to wait until more than one survey has been completed.

Help people know more about this route by volunteering to submit a survey.

  1. Complete the survey training.
  2. Submit a survey for this route.

Sign up or log in to get the link to survey this route for Snodit.

Geography information system (GIS) data

Total length

Maximum elevation

Minimum elevation

Start and end points

Snodland
Grid Ref TQ7063761822
Lat / Lon 51.32989° / 0.44792°
Easting / Northing 570,637E / 161,822N
What3Words wakes.basically.maps
Ditton
Grid Ref TQ7156357986
Lat / Lon 51.29515° / 0.45936°
Easting / Northing 571,563E / 157,986N
What3Words expert.springing.wired

Snodit One's land is

Arable 1.5%
Urban 78.0%
Water 20.4%

Data: Corine Land Cover (CLC) 2018

review


Daisy C

22 Mar 2024 Spring

This is a good route but let down by the line being inexact and thus misleading, in just the area where both OS and OS base mapping also have some issues which gives the same misleading impression. In practice it's not too bad, and I've seen routes with more serious problems that have been verified. But, as there are no pre-existing reviews on the route, I'm going to upload a new, unambiguous version so any future walkers don't waste any time deliberating or even following the wrong path. The new route uses and the gps line I actually walked along and should fit clearly onto the base maps.

The issues were along the River Medway section where the public footpath consistently runs along a concrete shelf or bund on the *river* side of the flood defense wall for the industrial sites. A combination of things make it seem plausible that the route goes inland just north and just south of where the actual, riverside footpath has a junction with New Hythe Lane. The OS map makes the public footpath seem to lie along roads within the industrial areas and inland of the riverwall. The SnoDit 1 route line is drawn even further inland. The fingerpost at the junction doesn't clarify things and the concrete riverside path has a neglected air and looks as likely to be a dead-end engineering feature as a dedicated Public Right of Way. Open Street Maps are, as usual, more detailed and in theory helpful, but part of the path to the north of the junction (where it physically hangs over the river!) is missing from OSM, suggesting a dead end and so, again, that the route (and PRoW) must be on the landward side of the river wall because OSM don't differentiate PRoW from private paths and roads. If you made the wrong choice there are no informal cut throughs between the river and the industrial park's roads, just high walls topped with barbed or razor wire. You'd have to double right back.


Share your views about this route, give it a star rating, indicate whether it should be verified or not.

Include information that will be useful to others considering to walk or wheel it.

You can add up to 15 photos.

Overall ratings

1 reviews


0 reviews

1 reviews

0 reviews

0 reviews

0 reviews

Show all


Other Routes for Snodland—Ditton See all Slow Ways

Snodland—Ditton

Snodit two

Distance

6km/4mi

Ascent

50 m

Descent

35 m

Review this better route and help establish a trusted network of walking routes.

Suggest a better route if it better meets our methodology.

See all routes from Snodland.

See all routes from Ditton.