Back our crowdfunder for shorter, circular and themed routes Back our crowdfunder to empower charities, schools, councils and voluntary organisations to create their own networks Back our crowdfunder to create pathways to longer, richer and more joyful lives Back our crowdfunder for more inclusive routes Back our crowdfunder to add Ireland and the Channel Islands Back our crowdfunder to make it easier to follow the best routes Back our crowdfunder for everyone who walks, runs, wheels, cycles or rides Back our crowdfunder to connect millions more people and places Back our crowdfunder for a national network that supports wellbeing, communities and climate action Back our crowdfunder to build the ultimate walking, running and riding network

Chippenham — Malmesbury

Chimal two
Not verified

Slow Way not verified yet. Verify Chimal here.

By Stephenwalking on 03 May 2021

Distance

18km/11mi

Ascent

153m

Descent

110m

Download this route

Are you sure you want to download this route?

Using a GPX file for the first time?

No, back to route

Give a hike

Pledge to walk this route and help firm up its place in the network - every walk helps.

So far it has been reviewed by three people and surveyed by one person and

Two people have pledged to review this route.

Your pledged routes will show up in your pledges Waylist.

Every review and survey pledged and then walked will help make the Slow Ways network better, thank you for your help!

Sign up or log in to pledge to walk this route.

Back to route

Save to Waylist

Sign up or log in to save this route so you can find it more easily or plan a longer journey.

More options

Save to my account

Sign up or log in to save this route so you can find it more easily or plan a longer journey.

Print (via Inkatlas)

Survey this route

Review this route

Suggest a better route

Report a problem

Description

I tried writing a description and it didn't save . So anyway , I'll try again. There are no good off-road routes from Chi to Mal. Basically because of the M4, and because of the urban sprawl that is Chippenham. But try this.

All the C and B roads are safe and wide and easily walked by the competent walker. And the 429 into Malmesbury has a footpath alongside it (on the north / west side). Things to do on this route are see Kellaways / Maud / Heath's Causeway / Monument, and the NT Sutton Lane Meadows. And there are 2 pubs and a post office / coffee shop (in the Bell Hotel) at Sutton Benger)

I tried writing a description and it didn't save . So anyway , I'll try again. There are no good off-road routes from Chi to Mal. Basically because of the M4, and because of the urban sprawl that is Chippenham. But try this.

All the C and B roads are safe and wide and easily walked by the competent walker. And the 429 into Malmesbury has a footpath alongside it (on the north / west side). Things to do on this route are see Kellaways / Maud / Heath's Causeway / Monument, and the NT Sutton Lane Meadows. And there are 2 pubs and a post office / coffee shop (in the Bell Hotel) at Sutton Benger)

Status

This route has been reviewed by 3 people.

There are no issues flagged.

Photos for Chimal two

Photos of this route will appear when they are added to a review. You can review this route here.

Information

Not verified

Route status - Live

Reviews - 3

Average rating -

Is this route good enough? -  Yes (3)

There are currently no problems reported with this route.

Downloads - 11

Surveys

What is this route like?

Surveys are submitted by fellow users of this website and show what you might expect from this Slow Ways route. Scroll down the page to read more detailed surveys.

Grade 3X based on 1 surveys Sign up or log in to survey this route.
Description Note
Grade 3: Route includes rough surfaces that may include small boulders, potholes, shallow ruts, loose gravel, short muddy sections.
Access grade X: At least one stile, flight of steps or other obstacle that is highly likely to block access for wheelchair and scooter users.		 Grading is based on average scores by surveyors. This slow way has 1 surveys.
Full grading description

Only people who have completed our training can become Slow Ways surveyors and submit a survey. We do not vet contributors, so we cannot guarantee the quality or completeness of the surveys they complete. If you are dependent on the information being correct we recommend reading and comparing surveys before setting off.

Survey Photos

Facilities

Facilities in the middle third of this route.

Not present at time of survey Public toilet (1)
Not present at time of survey Wheelchair accessible toilet (1)
Present at time of survey Supermarket (1)
Present at time of survey Restaurant (1)
Maybe present Vegan restaurant (1)
Present at time of survey Accommodation (1)
Maybe present Accommodation < £50 (1)
Not present at time of survey Campsite (1)
Not present at time of survey Bothy (1)
Not present at time of survey Free wifi (1)
Not present at time of survey Public phone (1)
Present at time of survey Mobile phone coverage (1)
Not present at time of survey Train station (1)
Present at time of survey Bench (1)
Not present at time of survey Picnic table (1)
Present at time of survey Bus stop (1)
Not present at time of survey Ferry (1)

Challenges

Potential challenges reported on this route. Some challenges are seasonal.

Not present at time of survey Scrambling (1)
Not present at time of survey Wading (1)
Not present at time of survey Swimming (1)
Not present at time of survey Climbing (1)
Not present at time of survey Stepping stones (1)
Not present at time of survey Very slippery (1)
Maybe present Very muddy (1)
Not present at time of survey Very icy (1)
Not present at time of survey Likely to flood (1)
Present at time of survey Long grass sections (1)
Present at time of survey Crops encroaching on path (1)
Not present at time of survey Diverted path (1)

Obstacles

Obstacles on this route.

Present at time of survey Stiles (1)
Present at time of survey Step and kerbs (1)
Not present at time of survey Possible to avoid steps, if applicable (1)
Present at time of survey Flights of steps (1)
Present at time of survey Gates (1)
Not present at time of survey Kissing gates (1)
Not present at time of survey Locked gates (1)
Not present at time of survey Disables access gates (1)
Not present at time of survey Cycle barriers (1)
Not present at time of survey Ladders (1)
Not present at time of survey Cattle grids (1)
Not present at time of survey Fords (1)
Present at time of survey Narrow bridges (1)
Not present at time of survey Ferry required (1)
Present at time of survey Acceptable road walking (1)
Not present at time of survey Unacceptable road walking (1)
Not present at time of survey Dangerous road crossings (1)
Present at time of survey Walking on paths beside roads (1)
Not present at time of survey Walking on verges beside roads (1)
Not present at time of survey Railway crossings (1)
Not present at time of survey River crossings (1)
Present at time of survey Cattle possible (1)
Not present at time of survey Horses possible (1)
Not present at time of survey Tidal area (1)
Not present at time of survey Potential falls (1)
Not present at time of survey Exposed to elements (1)
Not present at time of survey Remote area (1)
Not present at time of survey Mountainous area (1)
Not present at time of survey Military training area (1)
Present at time of survey No visible path (1)
Maybe present Seasonal nesting birds (1)
Not present at time of survey Other hazards (1)

Accessibility

Is this route step and stile free?

Not present at time of survey Free of stiles (1)
Not present at time of survey Free of single steps/kerbs (1)
Not present at time of survey Free of flights of steps (1)
Not present at time of survey Free of other obstacles (1)

Measurements

Surveyors were asked to measure the narrowest and steepest parts of paths.

The narrowest part of the path is 55.0cm (1)

The steepest uphill gradient walking East 32.0% (1)

The steepest uphill gradient walking West 36.0% (1)

The steepest camber gradient across the path 5.0% (1)

How clear is the waymarking on the route: Unclear in places (1)

Successfully completed

We asked route surveyors "Have you successfully completed this route with any of the following? If so, would you recommend it to someone with the same requirements?". Here is how they replied.

Present at time of survey Small Pug-sized dog (1)
Maybe present Small Labrador-sized dog (1)
Not present at time of survey Large St. Bernard-sized dog (1)
Not present at time of survey Standard pram (1)
Not present at time of survey Off-road rugged pram (1)
Not present at time of survey Standard wheelchair (1)
Not present at time of survey Off-road rugged wheelchair (1)
Not present at time of survey Standard mobility scooter (1)
Not present at time of survey Off-road rugged mobility scooter (1)

Recommended by an expert

We asked route surveyors "Are you a trained access professional, officer or expert? If so, is this route suitable for someone travelling with any of the following?" Here is how they replied.

Present at time of survey Small Pug-sized dog (1)
Maybe present Small Labrador-sized dog (1)
Not present at time of survey Large St. Bernard-sized dog (1)
Not present at time of survey Standard pram (1)
Not present at time of survey Off-road rugged pram (1)
Not present at time of survey Standard wheelchair (1)
Not present at time of survey Off-road rugged wheelchair (1)
Not present at time of survey Standard mobility scooter (1)
Not present at time of survey Off-road rugged mobility scooter (1)

Terrain

We asked route surveyors to estimate how much of the route goes through different kinds of terrain.

47.0% of the route is on roads (1)

13.0% of the route is lit at night (1)

64.0% of the route is paved (1)

5.0% of the route is muddy (1)

5.0% of the route is over rough ground (1)

6.0% of the route is through long grass (1)

Report a problem with this data

1 surveys

Information from verified surveys.

3X October 2022 by Brian
Read survey

Sign up or log in to get the link to survey this route for Chimal.

Geography information system (GIS) data

Total length

Maximum elevation

Minimum elevation

Start and end points

Chippenham
Grid Ref ST9202773318
Lat / Lon 51.45878° / -2.11614°
Easting / Northing 392,027E / 173,318N
What3Words legs.daydreams.estuaries
Malmesbury
Grid Ref ST9338287191
Lat / Lon 51.58354° / -2.09690°
Easting / Northing 393,382E / 187,191N
What3Words twins.screeches.trying

Sorry Land Cover data is not currently available for this route. Please check back later.

reviews

Sign up or log in to review this route for Chimal.

Overall ratings

3 reviews

0 reviews

3 reviews

0 reviews

0 reviews

0 reviews

Show all

Other Routes for Chippenham—Malmesbury See all Slow Ways

Chippenham—Malmesbury

Chimal one

U U

Distance

18km/11mi

Ascent

206 m

Descent

164 m

Review this better route and help establish a trusted network of walking routes.

Suggest a better route if it better meets our methodology.

See all routes from Chippenham.

See all routes from Malmesbury.