Chesterfield — Clay Cross
Checla one
Verified Slow Way
Verified by 100.00% of reviewers
Verified Slow Way
Verified by 100.00% of reviewers
By a Slow Ways Volunteer on 07 Apr 2021
Description
This is a Slow Ways route connecting Chesterfield and Clay Cross.
Know of a better route? Share it here.
This is a Slow Ways route connecting Chesterfield and Clay Cross.
Know of a better route? Share it here.
Status
This route has been reviewed by 3 people.
There are no issues flagged.
Photos for Checla one
Photos of this route will appear when they are added to a review. You can review this route here.
Information
Route status - Live
Reviews - 3
Average rating -
Is this route good enough? - Yes (3)
There are currently no problems reported with this route.
Downloads - 8
Surveys
What is this route like?
Surveys are submitted by fellow users of this website and show what you might expect from this Slow Ways route. Scroll down the page to read more detailed surveys.
| Grade 3X based on 1 surveys | Sign up or log in to survey this route. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Description | Note | ||
| Grade 3: Route includes rough surfaces that may include small boulders, potholes, shallow ruts, loose gravel, short muddy sections. Access grade X: At least one stile, flight of steps or other obstacle that is highly likely to block access for wheelchair and scooter users. |
Grading is based on average scores by surveyors. This slow way has 1 surveys. | ||
| Full grading description | |||
Only people who have completed our training can become Slow Ways surveyors and submit a survey. We do not vet contributors, so we cannot guarantee the quality or completeness of the surveys they complete. If you are dependent on the information being correct we recommend reading and comparing surveys before setting off.
Survey Photos
Facilities
Facilities in the middle third of this route.
Challenges
Potential challenges reported on this route. Some challenges are seasonal.
Obstacles
Obstacles on this route.
Accessibility
Is this route step and stile free?
Measurements
Surveyors were asked to measure the narrowest and steepest parts of paths.
Narrowest part of path: no data
The steepest uphill gradient East: no data
The steepest uphill gradient West: no data
The steepest camber: no data
We don't have clear data on the waymarking (1)
Successfully completed
We asked route surveyors "Have you successfully completed this route with any of the following? If so, would you recommend it to someone with the same requirements?". Here is how they replied.
Recommended by an expert
We asked route surveyors "Are you a trained access professional, officer or expert? If so, is this route suitable for someone travelling with any of the following?" Here is how they replied.
Terrain
We asked route surveyors to estimate how much of the route goes through different kinds of terrain.
There is no data on how much of this route is on roads
There is no data on how much of this route is lit at night
Thereis no data on amount of route paved
There is no data on muddiness
There is no data on rough ground
There is no data on long grass
Report a problem with this data
1 surveys
Information from verified surveys.
Geography information system (GIS) data
Total length
Maximum elevation
Minimum elevation
Start and end points
Chesterfield
Grid Ref
SK3850071140
Lat / Lon
53.23592° / -1.42464°
Easting / Northing
438,500E / 371,140N
What3Words
silly.shall.hook
Clay Cross
Grid Ref
SK3926863469
Lat / Lon
53.16692° / -1.41407°
Easting / Northing
439,268E / 363,469N
What3Words
saga.slanting.saga
Checla One's land is
| Chesterfield | |
|---|---|
| Grid Ref | SK3850071140 |
| Lat / Lon | 53.23592° / -1.42464° |
| Easting / Northing | 438,500E / 371,140N |
| What3Words | silly.shall.hook |
| Clay Cross | |
|---|---|
| Grid Ref | SK3926863469 |
| Lat / Lon | 53.16692° / -1.41407° |
| Easting / Northing | 439,268E / 363,469N |
| What3Words | saga.slanting.saga |
| Arable | 42.9% |
| Other agricultural land | 8.4% |
| Urban | 48.7% |
Data: Corine Land Cover (CLC) 2018
reviews
StephenWalker
20 Sep 2023I thoroughly enjoyed this route, walked on one of the hottest days of 2023. I liked the leisurely exit from Chesterfield. It is testament to planners and conservationists that the route through the valley via Hasland is as green and peaceful as it is; not so long ago it was the scene of rail Sidings, coking plants and chemicals. A remarkable recovery. I found the route easy to find and follow. It is too short to need much along the way, but the beer in the Old English Inn at Clay Cross was excellent and most welcome.
Ken
27 Feb 2022I liked this exit from Chesterfield along the shopping street, past the market and a safe bridge over the main road into Queens Park. Otherwise I'm happy to go along with the review by Jamie. It was muddy after rain plus stiles. The walk is direct, well plotted and as level as it could be following the valley as does the railway. This route also offers a good direct Slow Way Chesterfield to North Wingfield. It's a shame that the approach to Clay Cross is rather hemmed in. I was pleased to see water from the flooded path now has an outlet, so it wasn't quite as wet. Look out for the castle turret. Clanor two takes a route that avoids the main road approach but misses the Retail park.
-
Share your thoughts
Jamie M
10 May 2021I very much enjoyed this route which I walked on 9 May 2021. Though living locally, I was unfamiliar with much of the route but had few navigational problems. I did a one way walk starting from Chesterfield and would happily use the route again.
Positives:
Interesting and varied route.
Avoids much of the recent large scale residential development in the area.
Very little roadside walking away from the town centres.
No cattle grazing.
Negatives:
No benches or anywhere else to sit, other than on the ground, making breaks en route difficult.
No shops, refreshment facilities, or toilets outside the towns.
Mud and puddles remained after rain the previous day.
Potential for short sections to become overgrown.
Observations:
Parts of route very popular with dog walkers.
Route passes along the edge of a field where horses are exercised, though none were present.
No really steep gradients.
Restrictions:
Steps: Just one flight of 4, and avoidable.
Stiles: 6, all small.
Gates: 6
Width Restrictors: 6
Narrow footbridges: None.
The route starts at the foot of Chesterfield’s crooked spire and detours via Queen’s Park to minimise roadside walking. If doing this as part of a longer walk I’d probably omit this loop and cut through the retail park. After crossing the busy Derby Road at a pelican crossing the route avoids main roads. It then skirts the edge of Hasland on narrow grassy paths, where care is needed at junctions to keep on the correct route. There is then a long, mostly rural, stretch with good views.
Eventually the route turns left to climb Hagg Hill, roadside walking on a good surfaced path. This is probably the most noticeable ascent in this direction, but the route soon turns off to the right. After Hagg Hill House a path junction may cause uncertainty – curve right on the wider path, not left onto the grassy alternative. Soon the route reaches a footpath crossroads and turns right onto a long straight path. Going straight on instead would provide an alternative route to North Wingfield using a short section of Clanor 2.
After a brief section of roadside walking to cross the railway the route turns left and follows the rail line for the rest of the way into Clay Cross. The path is confined between fences, and puddles from the previous day’s rain had not drained away. Views here are limited. Eventually the main road is reached and is followed to reach the centre of Clay Cross.
-
Share your thoughts
Share your views about this route, give it a star rating, indicate whether it should be verified or not.
Include information that will be useful to others considering to walk or wheel it.
You can add up to 15 photos.
There are no other routes for Chesterfield — Clay Cross
If you know a better way, then please let us know.
Review this better route and help establish a trusted network of walking routes.
Suggest a better route if it better meets our methodology.
Share your thoughts