Description
This is a Slow Ways route connecting Wymondham and Mulbarton.
Know of a better route? Share it here.
This is a Slow Ways route connecting Wymondham and Mulbarton.
Know of a better route? Share it here.
Status
This route has been reviewed by 3 people.
This route has potentially been flagged (2 times) for reasons relating to access.
Photos for Wymmul one
Photos of this route will appear when they are added to a review. You can review this route here.
Information
Route status - Live
Reviews - 3
Average rating -
Is this route good enough? - Yes (1) Maybe (2)
Problems reported - Access (2)
Downloads - 7
Surveys
We are working to build-up a picture of what routes look like. To do that we are asking volunteers to survey routes so that we can communicate features, obstacles and challenges that may make a route desirable or not.
Slow Ways surveyors are asked to complete some basic online training, but they are not vetted. If you are dependent on the survey information being correct in order to complete a route, we recommend that you think critically about the information provided. You may also wish to wait until more than one survey has been completed.
Help people know more about this route by volunteering to submit a survey.
- Complete the survey training.
- Submit a survey for this route.
Geography information system (GIS) data
Total length
Maximum elevation
Minimum elevation
Start and end points
Wymondham
Grid Ref
TG1106801471
Lat / Lon
52.57011° / 1.11314°
Easting / Northing
611,068E / 301,471N
What3Words
toolbar.slick.magnitude
Mulbarton
Grid Ref
TG1929900230
Lat / Lon
52.55572° / 1.23357°
Easting / Northing
619,299E / 300,230N
What3Words
dragon.scribble.extreme
Wymmul One's land is
| Wymondham | |
|---|---|
| Grid Ref | TG1106801471 |
| Lat / Lon | 52.57011° / 1.11314° |
| Easting / Northing | 611,068E / 301,471N |
| What3Words | toolbar.slick.magnitude |
| Mulbarton | |
|---|---|
| Grid Ref | TG1929900230 |
| Lat / Lon | 52.55572° / 1.23357° |
| Easting / Northing | 619,299E / 300,230N |
| What3Words | dragon.scribble.extreme |
| Arable | 59.0% |
| Pasture | 22.1% |
| Urban | 14.8% |
| Woods | 4.1% |
Data: Corine Land Cover (CLC) 2018
reviews
Sam Talbot
25 Apr 2025This is a lovely walk through the Norfolk countryside, hindered only by the fact that the last leg of the walk is now not accessible. This is due to the construction of a solar farm, which looks to have happened fairly recently. This is in the field to the west of Hall Plantation. We completed the route by following the public footpath west and then north, to skirt round the edge of the new solar farm. We joined the road at Spong Lane and then headed into Mulbarton from there. Not ideal, as it involves road walking with no pavement. There may be a better way to end this walk, but I didn't have time to scope out the area in great detail.
Katie Parsons
19 Jun 2023This was enjoyable route to walk and the majority of it follows the ketts county trail which is signposted. This route is for walkers only as has some very narrow paths which were very overgrown in some parts. The route is mainly through fields however there are also some parts on the road and at one point you have to cross Norwich road which is quite a busy road. A few parts of the route were quite hidden.
-
Share your thoughts
Pete Sturman
24 Apr 2021 (edited 27 Jun 2023)A lot of the route is the Kett's Country Walk, which isn't signposted. Though pleasant, the route meanders for the sake of it. Apart from the road from the A11 to Lotus Cars, most of the lanes around here are quiet enough for walkers.
-
Katy Walters
05 Oct 2022As of summer 2022 the Kett's Country Walk has had new signage throughout.
-
Share your thoughts
Share your views about this route, give it a star rating, indicate whether it should be verified or not.
Include information that will be useful to others considering to walk or wheel it.
You can add up to 15 photos.
Other Routes for Wymondham—Mulbarton See all Slow Ways
Review this better route and help establish a trusted network of walking routes.
Suggest a better route if it better meets our methodology.
Share your thoughts