PyecombeWoodingdean

Pyewoo one
Not verified

Slow Way not verified yet. Verify Pyewoo here.

By a Slow Ways Volunteer on 07 Apr 2021


Distance

13km/8mi

Ascent

298m

Descent

327m

Download this route

Are you sure you want to download this route?

Using a GPX file for the first time?

No, back to route

Give a hike

Pledge to walk this route and help firm up its place in the network - every walk helps.

So far it has been reviewed by three people and surveyed by one person and there is one issue flagged with this route.

Two people have pledged to review this route.

Your pledged routes will show up in your pledges Waylist.

Every review and survey pledged and then walked will help make the Slow Ways network better, thank you for your help!

Sign up or log in to pledge to walk this route.

Back to route

Save to Waylist

Sign up or log in to save this route so you can find it more easily or plan a longer journey.

More options

Save to my account

Sign up or log in to save this route so you can find it more easily or plan a longer journey.

Print (via Inkatlas)

Survey this route

Review this route

Suggest a better route

Report a problem

Description

This is a Slow Ways route connecting Pyecombe and Woodingdean.

Know of a better route? Share it here.

This is a Slow Ways route connecting Pyecombe and Woodingdean.

Know of a better route? Share it here.

Status

This route has been reviewed by 3 people.

This route has been flagged (1 time) for reasons relating to access.

Photos for Pyewoo one

Photos of this route will appear when they are added to a review. You can review this route here.


Information

Not verified

Route status - Live

Reviews - 3

Average rating -

Is this route good enough? -  Yes (2) No (1)

Problems reported -  Access (1)

Downloads - 15

Surveys

What is this route like?

Surveys are submitted by fellow users of this website and show what you might expect from this Slow Ways route. Scroll down the page to read more detailed surveys.

Grade 3X based on 1 surveys Sign up or log in to survey this route.
Description Note
Grade 3: Route includes rough surfaces that may include small boulders, potholes, shallow ruts, loose gravel, short muddy sections.
Access grade X: At least one stile, flight of steps or other obstacle that is highly likely to block access for wheelchair and scooter users.
Grading is based on average scores by surveyors. This slow way has 1 surveys.
Full grading description

Only people who have completed our training can become Slow Ways surveyors and submit a survey. We do not vet contributors, so we cannot guarantee the quality or completeness of the surveys they complete. If you are dependent on the information being correct we recommend reading and comparing surveys before setting off.

Survey Photos

Facilities

Facilities in the middle third of this route.

Maybe present Public toilet (1)
Maybe present Wheelchair accessible toilet (1)
Maybe present Supermarket (1)
Present at time of survey Restaurant (1)
Maybe present Vegan restaurant (1)
Maybe present Accommodation (1)
Maybe present Accommodation < £50 (1)
Not present at time of survey Campsite (1)
Not present at time of survey Bothy (1)
Maybe present Free wifi (1)
Maybe present Public phone (1)
Present at time of survey Mobile phone coverage (1)
Present at time of survey Train station (1)
Present at time of survey Bench (1)
Present at time of survey Picnic table (1)
Present at time of survey Bus stop (1)
Not present at time of survey Ferry (1)

Challenges

Potential challenges reported on this route. Some challenges are seasonal.

Not present at time of survey Scrambling (1)
Not present at time of survey Wading (1)
Not present at time of survey Swimming (1)
Not present at time of survey Climbing (1)
Not present at time of survey Stepping stones (1)
Present at time of survey Very slippery (1)
Present at time of survey Very muddy (1)
Not present at time of survey Very icy (1)
Not present at time of survey Likely to flood (1)
Maybe present Long grass sections (1)
Maybe present Crops encroaching on path (1)
Not present at time of survey Diverted path (1)

Obstacles

Obstacles on this route.

Present at time of survey Stiles (1)
Present at time of survey Step and kerbs (1)
Maybe present Possible to avoid steps, if applicable (1)
Not present at time of survey Flights of steps (1)
Present at time of survey Gates (1)
Present at time of survey Kissing gates (1)
Not present at time of survey Locked gates (1)
Not present at time of survey Disables access gates (1)
Not present at time of survey Cycle barriers (1)
Not present at time of survey Ladders (1)
Not present at time of survey Cattle grids (1)
Not present at time of survey Fords (1)
Not present at time of survey Narrow bridges (1)
Not present at time of survey Ferry required (1)
Present at time of survey Acceptable road walking (1)
Not present at time of survey Unacceptable road walking (1)
Present at time of survey Dangerous road crossings (1)
Present at time of survey Walking on paths beside roads (1)
Not present at time of survey Walking on verges beside roads (1)
Not present at time of survey Railway crossings (1)
Not present at time of survey River crossings (1)
Present at time of survey Cattle possible (1)
Present at time of survey Horses possible (1)
Not present at time of survey Tidal area (1)
Not present at time of survey Potential falls (1)
Present at time of survey Exposed to elements (1)
Not present at time of survey Remote area (1)
Not present at time of survey Mountainous area (1)
Not present at time of survey Military training area (1)
Not present at time of survey No visible path (1)
Not present at time of survey Seasonal nesting birds (1)
Not present at time of survey Other hazards (1)

Accessibility

Is this route step and stile free?

Not present at time of survey Free of stiles (1)
Not present at time of survey Free of single steps/kerbs (1)
Present at time of survey Free of flights of steps (1)
Not present at time of survey Free of other obstacles (1)

Measurements

Surveyors were asked to measure the narrowest and steepest parts of paths.

Narrowest part of path: no data

The steepest uphill gradient East: no data

The steepest uphill gradient West: no data

The steepest camber: no data

How clear is the waymarking on the route: Clear (1)

Successfully completed

We asked route surveyors "Have you successfully completed this route with any of the following? If so, would you recommend it to someone with the same requirements?". Here is how they replied.

Small Pug-sized dog (0)
Small Labrador-sized dog (0)
Large St. Bernard-sized dog (0)
Standard pram (0)
Off-road rugged pram (0)
Standard wheelchair (0)
Off-road rugged wheelchair (0)
Standard mobility scooter (0)
Off-road rugged mobility scooter (0)

Recommended by an expert

We asked route surveyors "Are you a trained access professional, officer or expert? If so, is this route suitable for someone travelling with any of the following?" Here is how they replied.

Small Pug-sized dog (0)
Small Labrador-sized dog (0)
Large St. Bernard-sized dog (0)
Standard pram (0)
Off-road rugged pram (0)
Standard wheelchair (0)
Off-road rugged wheelchair (0)
Standard mobility scooter (0)
Off-road rugged mobility scooter (0)

Terrain

We asked route surveyors to estimate how much of the route goes through different kinds of terrain.

5.0% of the route is on roads (1)

5.0% of the route is lit at night (1)

15.0% of the route is paved (1)

5.0% of the route is muddy (1)

10.0% of the route is over rough ground (1)

There is no data on long grass

Report a problem with this data

1 surveys

Information from verified surveys.

3X December 2021 by Bostal Boy
Read survey

Sign up or log in to get the link to survey this route for Pyewoo.

Geography information system (GIS) data

Total length

Maximum elevation

Minimum elevation

Start and end points

Pyecombe
Grid Ref TQ2922312657
Lat / Lon 50.89894° / -0.16374°
Easting / Northing 529,223E / 112,657N
What3Words unlucky.forensic.gadget
Woodingdean
Grid Ref TQ3551405849
Lat / Lon 50.83631° / -0.07685°
Easting / Northing 535,514E / 105,849N
What3Words arena.hairspray.jingles

Pyewoo One's land is

Arable 31.9%
Pasture 41.9%
Urban 25.3%
Woods 0.9%

Data: Corine Land Cover (CLC) 2018

reviews


Daisy C

04 Mar 2025 (edited 08 Mar 2025) Winter

I walked it in two parts both from Falmer Station. One day to Woodingdean (after looking around the campus) and the next from Falmer Station to Pyecombe, both in combination with other Slow Ways.
There are beautiful views on this route worth 5 stars, perhaps especially the final views towards Pyecombe across the Clayton Gap. I agree with the earlier reviews but found problems they didn't mention. Worst were two paths blocked off at one end forcing retraced steps, not good enough for the Slow Ways network. Misleading base maps are probably why and I think walking the other way they may barely register as you can't even start down the blocked paths and the alternative is clear.

All are listed from Pyecombe to Woodingdean (as per the route name) but I did mostly walk the other way:
* A path has been moved to the field edge at ///users.juggle.sourcing but it has no practical effect.
* Next, and worst, was at the small woodland west of Lower Standean. See my map, photo 1, usable path in purple. I followed the route which seems to be the legal Public Right of Way (BR 19Py) along the track through the wood (per both OS & W Sussex's maps). The end turn was blocked by a mound of dense vegetation. A possible reasonable detour ahead was also blocked by an electric fence. Scrambling through the woodland with no apparent path looked unpromising, my only choice was the private farm track outside of the woodland, also visible on both maps. It was an unnecessary 300m plus time looking for ways through. Strava's heat map shows regular runners use the field track. When I looked from the other side, where the bridleway should cross into the woods from the field, I found a marker post hidden even in winter vegetation. It points east down the field edge, definitely not south into the woods. There is no gate or stile and people have climbed and bent the fence trying to get out of the woods, I doubt the farmer wants that. Photo 2. A sign at the woodland entrance would help everyone.
* At New Barn the stile (S6549) at ///flirts.overpaid.letters has barbed wire strung across the top bar. Large grid wiring between the lower bars makes a good foothold tricky, both are perhaps for keeping in lambs. There's no tall post to hold either, plus a slight drop the other side. It's hard to keep steady and not snag clothes or legs. The stile has a yellow arrow. Between me and a very muddy farm gate was a nervous but persistent pregnant ewe so I didn't investigate it. Photo 3
* Stanmer Park is extensive and publicly accessible, (owned by Brighton & Hove). At the top of the very steep hill climb east of Stanmer Village is a mapped permissive path (OS and B&H online maps) that goes straight into the woodland but is now blocked by a reinforced fence. The trouble is that coming the other way there is actually a small path in that position. The true turn off is further north at a B&H fingerpost with a (muddy) kissing gate into the field. Photo 3
* The path leaving the western edge of the uni campus goes diagonally through the walls of the Jubilee multi storey car park. Not a biggie as I continued straight uphill but had I tried the east side instead it would have been through more car parking, missing the pleasant woodland edge. That car park will probably be a building site soon.
* The final problem may be limited to sunny weekends and holidays. From Falmer Village the bike friendly path along a ridge was safe and a little set back but 2.5km / 1.5mi is unscreened from a busy road. If trees ever grow in the gap they will be windswept and stunted and could block the redeeming views. The noisy traffic really spoilt the walk so the final rating is only 4 stars, it was particularly bad towards Woodingdean with a long tailback from the traffic lights. Photos 4 and 5.

I've uploaded a new version of this route using the actual positions of usable paths, also avoiding the one very steep hill and with a very few small improvements. At some point I'll upload another new route with a totally different southern half that avoids that busy road and has half the amount of road walking overall.


Harry Holmes

22 Nov 2023 Autumn

The route starts along a paved footpath on the side of an a-road for the first two miles, quickly opening up to expansive views of the Downs.

After passing Brighton football stadium, it enters a small wood of beech and sycamore.

It becomes slightly tricky to follow the right route through Sussex uni campus but only for a short time and Stanmer Wood makes it worthwhile.

Cutting down to Stanmer gives the opportunity for a pit stop at Stanmer Tea Rooms.

Once over Ditchling Road, secluded valleys take you on chalk paths towards Pyecombe.

The final stretch cuts over the golf club.


Bostal Boy

26 Dec 2021 Winter

Walked on the morning after the winter solstice. The route starts following the village street to the junction with the busy A273. Crossing this road is unavoidable but caution is advised. Once over the road, a permissive bridle path heads briefly parallel to the main road then turns sharply to head uphill and onto the Downs. It crosses a golf course then follows farm tracks and field edges over undulating scenery. It passes through Lower Standean farmyard and past the impressive New Barn with its flint walls and half-hipped roof could only be in Sussex.

After crossing Ditchling Road the route heads into Stanmer Park towards the village which has a popular teashop. Heading away from the village up onto Richmond Hill, the grass path is steep and slippery when wet and muddy. Nice views of Stanmer House and Church from the top. The field is home to grazing cattle. The path then heads into the campus of Sussex University (worth a look round), passing through and out to Falmer village. There is a pub (The Swan) by the footbridge over the A27.

The final section is a tarmac cycle path alongside Falmer Road to Woodingdean.

This is a varied walk with plenty to see. Well signed and traced on the map. The path is easy to follow with several gates and one stile.

  • Daisy C

    Daisy C

    02 Mar 2025

    I've just walked Falmer to Woodingdean on the cycle path on the first sunny Sunday of spring/for months. The traffic on the road was bad but the second half was awful with constantly queuing traffic. I'm changing my plan to walk on to Peacehaven and will trial a new route to Stanmer instead.

  • Share your thoughts

    Please Sign up or log in to comment.


Share your views about this route, give it a star rating, indicate whether it should be verified or not.

Include information that will be useful to others considering to walk or wheel it.

You can add up to 15 photos.

Overall ratings

3 reviews


2 reviews

1 reviews

0 reviews

0 reviews

0 reviews

Show all


Other Routes for Pyecombe—Woodingdean See all Slow Ways

Pyecombe—Woodingdean

Pyewoo two

Distance

13km/8mi

Ascent

319 m

Descent

295 m

Pyecombe—Woodingdean

Pyewoo three

Distance

15km/10mi

Ascent

430 m

Descent

405 m

Review this better route and help establish a trusted network of walking routes.

Suggest a better route if it better meets our methodology.

See all routes from Pyecombe.

See all routes from Woodingdean.