NewburyKingsclere

Newbkin three
Verified route

Verified Slow Way

Verified by 75.00% of reviewers

By UrsulaH on 27 Jul 2021


Distance

12km/8mi

Ascent

149m

Descent

123m

Download this route

Are you sure you want to download this route?

Using a GPX file for the first time?

No, back to route

Give a hike

Pledge to walk this route and help firm up its place in the network - every walk helps.

So far it has been reviewed by four people and surveyed by one person and there is one issue flagged with this route.

No other people have pledged to review this route.

Your pledged routes will show up in your pledges Waylist.

Every review and survey pledged and then walked will help make the Slow Ways network better, thank you for your help!

Sign up or log in to pledge to walk this route.

Back to route

Save to Waylist

Sign up or log in to save this route so you can find it more easily or plan a longer journey.

More options

Save to my account

Sign up or log in to save this route so you can find it more easily or plan a longer journey.

Print (via Inkatlas)

Survey this route

Review this route

Suggest a better route

Report a problem

Description

Compared to Newbkin one, this route follows a more direct route out of Newbury, avoiding the alleyway which runs alongside the A339 dual carriageway in favour of Stroud Green and the quieter New Road. It also follows a more open route over Greenham Common using the gravel tracks instead of the woodland trail followed by Newbkin one.
After Greenham Common the route is the same as Newbkin one

Compared to Newbkin one, this route follows a more direct route out of Newbury, avoiding the alleyway which runs alongside the A339 dual carriageway in favour of Stroud Green and the quieter New Road. It also follows a more open route over Greenham Common using the gravel tracks instead of the woodland trail followed by Newbkin one.
After Greenham Common the route is the same as Newbkin one

Status

This route has been reviewed by 4 people.

This route has potentially been flagged (1 time) for reasons relating to access.

Photos for Newbkin three

Photos of this route will appear when they are added to a review. You can review this route here.


Information

Verified route

Route status - Live

Reviews - 4

Average rating -

Is this route good enough? -  Yes (3) Maybe (1)

Problems reported -  Access (1)

Downloads - 3

Surveys

What is this route like?

Surveys are submitted by fellow users of this website and show what you might expect from this Slow Ways route. Scroll down the page to read more detailed surveys.

Grade 3X based on 1 surveys Sign up or log in to survey this route.
Description Note
Grade 3: Route includes rough surfaces that may include small boulders, potholes, shallow ruts, loose gravel, short muddy sections.
Access grade X: At least one stile, flight of steps or other obstacle that is highly likely to block access for wheelchair and scooter users.
Grading is based on average scores by surveyors. This slow way has 1 surveys.
Full grading description

Only people who have completed our training can become Slow Ways surveyors and submit a survey. We do not vet contributors, so we cannot guarantee the quality or completeness of the surveys they complete. If you are dependent on the information being correct we recommend reading and comparing surveys before setting off.

Survey Photos

Facilities

Facilities in the middle third of this route.

Not present at time of survey Public toilet (1)
Not present at time of survey Wheelchair accessible toilet (1)
Not present at time of survey Supermarket (1)
Not present at time of survey Restaurant (1)
Not present at time of survey Vegan restaurant (1)
Not present at time of survey Accommodation (1)
Not present at time of survey Accommodation < £50 (1)
Not present at time of survey Campsite (1)
Not present at time of survey Bothy (1)
Not present at time of survey Free wifi (1)
Not present at time of survey Public phone (1)
Present at time of survey Mobile phone coverage (1)
Not present at time of survey Train station (1)
Not present at time of survey Bench (1)
Not present at time of survey Picnic table (1)
Not present at time of survey Bus stop (1)
Not present at time of survey Ferry (1)

Challenges

Potential challenges reported on this route. Some challenges are seasonal.

Not present at time of survey Scrambling (1)
Not present at time of survey Wading (1)
Not present at time of survey Swimming (1)
Not present at time of survey Climbing (1)
Not present at time of survey Stepping stones (1)
Present at time of survey Very slippery (1)
Present at time of survey Very muddy (1)
Maybe present Very icy (1)
Maybe present Likely to flood (1)
Present at time of survey Long grass sections (1)
Present at time of survey Crops encroaching on path (1)
Maybe present Diverted path (1)

Obstacles

Obstacles on this route.

Present at time of survey Stiles (1)
Present at time of survey Step and kerbs (1)
Not present at time of survey Possible to avoid steps, if applicable (1)
Present at time of survey Flights of steps (1)
Present at time of survey Gates (1)
Present at time of survey Kissing gates (1)
Not present at time of survey Locked gates (1)
Not present at time of survey Disables access gates (1)
Present at time of survey Cycle barriers (1)
Not present at time of survey Ladders (1)
Present at time of survey Cattle grids (1)
Maybe present Fords (1)
Present at time of survey Narrow bridges (1)
Not present at time of survey Ferry required (1)
Present at time of survey Acceptable road walking (1)
Not present at time of survey Unacceptable road walking (1)
Present at time of survey Dangerous road crossings (1)
Not present at time of survey Walking on paths beside roads (1)
Not present at time of survey Walking on verges beside roads (1)
Not present at time of survey Railway crossings (1)
Not present at time of survey River crossings (1)
Present at time of survey Cattle possible (1)
Present at time of survey Horses possible (1)
Not present at time of survey Tidal area (1)
Not present at time of survey Potential falls (1)
Present at time of survey Exposed to elements (1)
Not present at time of survey Remote area (1)
Not present at time of survey Mountainous area (1)
Not present at time of survey Military training area (1)
Not present at time of survey No visible path (1)
Present at time of survey Seasonal nesting birds (1)
Not present at time of survey Other hazards (1)

Accessibility

Is this route step and stile free?

Not present at time of survey Free of stiles (1)
Not present at time of survey Free of single steps/kerbs (1)
Not present at time of survey Free of flights of steps (1)
Not present at time of survey Free of other obstacles (1)

Measurements

Surveyors were asked to measure the narrowest and steepest parts of paths.

The narrowest part of the path is 40.0cm (1)

The steepest uphill gradient East: no data

The steepest uphill gradient West: no data

The steepest camber: no data

How clear is the waymarking on the route: Unclear in places (1)

Successfully completed

We asked route surveyors "Have you successfully completed this route with any of the following? If so, would you recommend it to someone with the same requirements?". Here is how they replied.

Small Pug-sized dog (0)
Small Labrador-sized dog (0)
Large St. Bernard-sized dog (0)
Standard pram (0)
Off-road rugged pram (0)
Standard wheelchair (0)
Off-road rugged wheelchair (0)
Standard mobility scooter (0)
Off-road rugged mobility scooter (0)

Recommended by an expert

We asked route surveyors "Are you a trained access professional, officer or expert? If so, is this route suitable for someone travelling with any of the following?" Here is how they replied.

Small Pug-sized dog (0)
Small Labrador-sized dog (0)
Large St. Bernard-sized dog (0)
Standard pram (0)
Off-road rugged pram (0)
Standard wheelchair (0)
Off-road rugged wheelchair (0)
Standard mobility scooter (0)
Off-road rugged mobility scooter (0)

Terrain

We asked route surveyors to estimate how much of the route goes through different kinds of terrain.

5.0% of the route is on roads (1)

3.0% of the route is lit at night (1)

10.0% of the route is paved (1)

50.0% of the route is muddy (1)

50.0% of the route is over rough ground (1)

10.0% of the route is through long grass (1)

Report a problem with this data

1 surveys

Information from verified surveys.

3X September 2024 by Berkshire Walker
Read survey

Sign up or log in to get the link to survey this route for Newbkin.

Geography information system (GIS) data

Total length

Maximum elevation

Minimum elevation

Start and end points

Newbury
Grid Ref SU4733567106
Lat / Lon 51.40102° / -1.32092°
Easting / Northing 447,335E / 167,106N
What3Words fades.rewarding.sorry
Kingsclere
Grid Ref SU5257758670
Lat / Lon 51.32471° / -1.24682°
Easting / Northing 452,577E / 158,670N
What3Words hydration.supplied.famed

Sorry Land Cover data is not currently available for this route. Please check back later.

reviews


Berkshire Walker

21 Sep 2024 Summer

A pleasant mainly off-road and mostly rural walk, apart from the outskirts of Newbury, passing through wooded Sydmonton Common and heathland Greenham Common. I walked from Kingsclere to Newbury. Many gates, footbridges, and stiles, occasionally muddy and narrow in places, and some of the smaller paths are tricky to locate, but no problems to report. No refreshments or shops on route, but shops, pubs, cafes at both ends, buses at Kingsclere and train/bus connections at Newbury.


Ursula

14 Jul 2024 Summer

Revisited this route July 2024, this time walking from Kingsclere to Newbury. At around the 1.5km mark, a small section of the Brenda Parker Way was overgrown causing us to divert to the road for a short distance. Apart from that, all the other trails were fine and good to see a more solid bridge now built over the stream on Sydmonton Common.


Martin Ellis

18 Jun 2022 Spring

Newbury to Kingsclere (Newbkin 3) review.

A walk from Newbury in Berkshire across into Hampshire; taking in Greenham Common, fields and woodland to arrive at Kingscleve on the edge of the North Wessex Downs.

There is some urban walking out of Newbury via an underpass and alongside Stroud Green.

Greenham Common had a request to keep to the main paths during nesting season (Photo 1). I was therefore unable to follow the exact route across the extensive parkland. I headed for the turfed bunkers (SF fans might recognise the Resistance base from ‘The Last Jedi’) and turned left (Photo 2).

The route crosses the A339 and the River Enborne county border. A footpath leads into the wooded Sydmonton Common. In an update to a previous review, there is now a fancy new bridge (Photo 3).

The Slow Way crosses a field at North Sydmonton and turns south down Hyde Lane. The lane was muddy in places even during a heat wave (June 2022). The route leaves the lane for footpaths across fields to eventually join the Brenda Parker Way (a long-distance path across Hampshire, Photo 4).

The route soon leaves the Way for a more direct path into Kingsclere (Photo 5). The Slow Ways ends in the centre of Kingsclere; with nearby convenience stores, a café, and the welcoming Crown pub (Photo 6).

I enjoyed this relaxing Slow Way. It didn’t have the panoramic views one gets from up in the surrounding North Wessex Downs, but its wooded sections did provide welcome shade during the height of summer.


Ursula

27 Jul 2021 Summer

Walked from Newbury to Kingsclere:
The route out of Newbury starts with a short section alongside the busy A339 before turning left to follow the footpath alongside Stroud Green and the quiet residential New Road. The road leads to a pedestrian walkway to emerge in Greenham. The route crosses the road to continue across Greenham Common on mainly gravel tracks popular with walkers, runners, and cyclists. On exiting the Common there is a small section of road to follow (no pavement) to reach the path across Sydmonton Common.
From here to Kingsclere the route then follows a mixture of paths across open fields, woodland trails, meadows, field boundaries and has some on-road sections. There are several stiles and wooden bridges along the way. Walked in July the vegetation was quite high in places (teeming with butterflies!) and the path across a couple of fields indistinct but the GPS track appeared accurate and agreed with the waymarkers. The on-road sections seemed to be very quiet back roads (we only encountered two cars) with no shops or facilities.

At the time of writing, July 2021, there was a ‘Path Closed’ sign on entry to Sydmonton Common (at approx. 5k) apparently for repairs to the footbridge. There was no sign of any maintenance work in progress and we found the bridge (photo #8) to be passable. However, Hampshire CC’s website currently shows the path due to be temporarily closed 28.07.2021 to 28.07.2022 so check the latest status if you are planning to walk this route - https://maps.hants.gov.uk/rightsofwaydefinitivemap/.


Share your views about this route, give it a star rating, indicate whether it should be verified or not.

Include information that will be useful to others considering to walk or wheel it.

You can add up to 15 photos.

Overall ratings

4 reviews


0 reviews

2 reviews

2 reviews

0 reviews

0 reviews

Show all


Other Routes for Newbury—Kingsclere See all Slow Ways

Newbury—Kingsclere

Newbkin one

Distance

14km/8mi

Ascent

165 m

Descent

143 m

Review this better route and help establish a trusted network of walking routes.

Suggest a better route if it better meets our methodology.

See all routes from Newbury.

See all routes from Kingsclere.