Description
This is a Slow Ways route connecting Ambleside and Windermere.
Know of a better route? Share it here.
This is a Slow Ways route connecting Ambleside and Windermere.
Know of a better route? Share it here.
Status
This route has been reviewed by 7 people.
This route has potentially been flagged (2 times) for reasons relating to safety.
Photos for Ambwin one
Photos of this route will appear when they are added to a review. You can review this route here.
Information
Route status - Live
Reviews - 7
Average rating -
Is this route good enough? - Yes (5) No (1) Maybe (1)
Problems reported - Safety (2)
Downloads - 16
Surveys
We are working to build-up a picture of what routes look like. To do that we are asking volunteers to survey routes so that we can communicate features, obstacles and challenges that may make a route desirable or not.
Slow Ways surveyors are asked to complete some basic online training, but they are not vetted. If you are dependent on the survey information being correct in order to complete a route, we recommend that you think critically about the information provided. You may also wish to wait until more than one survey has been completed.
Help people know more about this route by volunteering to submit a survey.
- Complete the survey training.
- Submit a survey for this route.
Geography information system (GIS) data
Total length
Maximum elevation
Minimum elevation
Start and end points
Ambleside
Grid Ref
NY3763604517
Lat / Lon
54.43224° / -2.96289°
Easting / Northing
337,636E / 504,517N
What3Words
back.violin.brownish
Windermere
Grid Ref
SD4141798630
Lat / Lon
54.37979° / -2.90344°
Easting / Northing
341,417E / 498,630N
What3Words
qualified.dressing.protected
Ambwin One's land is
Ambleside | |
---|---|
Grid Ref | NY3763604517 |
Lat / Lon | 54.43224° / -2.96289° |
Easting / Northing | 337,636E / 504,517N |
What3Words | back.violin.brownish |
Windermere | |
---|---|
Grid Ref | SD4141798630 |
Lat / Lon | 54.37979° / -2.90344° |
Easting / Northing | 341,417E / 498,630N |
What3Words | qualified.dressing.protected |
Pasture | 35.6% |
Urban | 29.3% |
Water | 4.6% |
Woods | 30.5% |
Data: Corine Land Cover (CLC) 2018
reviews
Paul Chilcott
01 Jan 2024December 2023. Direction: Windermere to Ambleside.
I was going to walk the much more interesting Ambwin2, but due to heavy rain the night before which continued all day during the walk, I opted for this more direct route. Without the traffic, it would still be an excellent route, but dodging the roadside splashes became a bit tedious after a while. Very direct though and it gets you there safely, even if a bit wet. Too wet for photos !.
Tim Ryan
02 Dec 2023I give this route a 3* rating. Whilst I agree that the volume of traffic is off-putting it is always safe with a pavement on at least one side of the road. As pointed out this is shared with cyclists but my experience in late November was that there were a few slow/careful cyclists on the path and any fast cyclists were on the road. But as pointed out in previous reviews the route is flat, easy to navigate, direct and with great views.?.
-
Share your thoughts
Anthony Aldred
26 May 2023 (edited 24 May 2023)A fairly easy walk to Windermere from Ambleside
Starts in the centre with excellent shops and cafes.
On route there is a Tesco and a couple of Spars for refreshments. The route is pavements to Ambleside pier then shortly afterwards you find yourself near the stunning lake.
Further on you will pass the Low Wood bay whos bus stop is reportedly the most scenic in Great Britain with views over the lake. The Low Wood also has a water sports centre with activities for hire.
Next you will pass (some pathways are narrow here Brockhole visitor centre and White Cross bay before reaching The Sun Inn with a left fork just before it. A small incline leads you on.
Later you will walk some pathways in woodland before eventually dropping down into Windermere
Quite a good walk but I prefer Amwin two.
Happy walking!.
-
Share your thoughts
Jo Wood
09 Aug 2022Simple to navigate as it follows the A591 for almost the entire route. But not a pleasant walk due to the traffic volume. The pavement is also a shared (sub-standard) bicycle path for much of the way adding to the general level of stress. Possibly useful as "bail-out" route if the weather is particularly poor or you are very tired. Several busses also take this route adding another bail-out option. Ambwin 2 is a much nicer off-road route and about the same distance.
-
Share your thoughts
Steve Lenartowicz
19 Jan 2022This is the most direct route from Ambleside to Windermere but it follows a busy main road. There is a pavement most of the way but you do have to cross the road more than once.
-
Share your thoughts
JimK
21 Nov 2021 (edited 22 Mar 2022)I think this is a dreadful route. I would have given it no stars but that does not seem to be an option. Its good points are that it is direct, flat and along the side of Windemere. Its bad point is that for 3 miles it is at the side of the A591 which is arguably the busiest road in the Lake District National Park. Walking along it on a Sunday morning it November I was accompanied by a continuous line of cars crawling past me. If you want to walk between Ambleside and Windemere there is a much better route as described in the Ambleside to Windemere section of route Conwin one.
-
Share your thoughts
Projectionist
28 Apr 2021This is a decent, efficient walk, skirting above Windermere, thus avoiding the road for this part, and ending/starting at Windermere Railway Station. However, nearly all of the route is using roadside paved paths - to be fair this still a good trip, but some fun can be had with a decent map, if you don't mind a couple of extra miles.
-
Share your thoughts
Share your views about this route, give it a star rating, indicate whether it should be verified or not.
Include information that will be useful to others considering to walk or wheel it.
You can add up to 15 photos.
Other Routes for Ambleside—Windermere See all Slow Ways
Review this better route and help establish a trusted network of walking routes.
Suggest a better route if it better meets our methodology.
Share your thoughts