Description
I thought I’d try out this former railway route, hoping that it would be a good wet weather alternative to EarSki One. It follows the former Colne-Skipton rail link. Campaign for Better Transport has this as a priority one candidate for re-opening:
https://bettertransport.org.uk/campaigns/reopen-rail-lines/ and
https://www.selrap.org.uk/ is campaigning specifically for this line.
There’s an interesting article here
http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/features/colne_and_skipton_line/index.shtml and some good videos here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=pGG9dL1rt5M and here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1vfhD9cy0Y .
The route may not last forever, but it’s worth exploring while you can!
I thought I’d try out this former railway route, hoping that it would be a good wet weather alternative to EarSki One. It follows the former Colne-Skipton rail link. Campaign for Better Transport has this as a priority one candidate for re-opening:
https://bettertransport.org.uk/campaigns/reopen-rail-lines/ and
https://www.selrap.org.uk/ is campaigning specifically for this line.
There’s an interesting article here
http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/features/colne_and_skipton_line/index.shtml and some good videos here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=pGG9dL1rt5M and here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1vfhD9cy0Y .
The route may not last forever, but it’s worth exploring while you can!
Status
This route has been reviewed by 1 person.
There are no issues flagged.
Photos for Earski two
Photos of this route will appear when they are added to a review. You can review this route here.
Information
Route status - Live
Reviews - 1
Average rating -
Is this route good enough? - Yes (1)
There are currently no problems reported with this route.
Downloads - 1
Surveys
What is this route like?
Surveys are submitted by fellow users of this website and show what you might expect from this Slow Ways route. Scroll down the page to read more detailed surveys.
Grade 4X based on 1 surveys | Sign up or log in to survey this route. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Description | Note | ||
Grade 4: Route includes very rough surfaces including deep ruts, steep loose gravel, unmade paths and deep muddy sections. Wheelchairs may experience traction/wheel spin issues. Access grade X: At least one stile, flight of steps or other obstacle that is highly likely to block access for wheelchair and scooter users. |
Grading is based on average scores by surveyors. This slow way has 1 surveys. | ||
Full grading description |
Only people who have completed our training can become Slow Ways surveyors and submit a survey. We do not vet contributors, so we cannot guarantee the quality or completeness of the surveys they complete. If you are dependent on the information being correct we recommend reading and comparing surveys before setting off.
Survey Photos
Facilities
Facilities in the middle third of this route.
Challenges
Potential challenges reported on this route. Some challenges are seasonal.
Obstacles
Obstacles on this route.
Accessibility
Is this route step and stile free?
Measurements
Surveyors were asked to measure the narrowest and steepest parts of paths.
The narrowest part of the path is 40.0cm (1)
The steepest uphill gradient walking East 38.0% (1)
The steepest uphill gradient walking West 29.0% (1)
The steepest camber gradient across the path 10.0% (1)
How clear is the waymarking on the route: Clear (1)
Successfully completed
We asked route surveyors "Have you successfully completed this route with any of the following? If so, would you recommend it to someone with the same requirements?". Here is how they replied.
Recommended by an expert
We asked route surveyors "Are you a trained access professional, officer or expert? If so, is this route suitable for someone travelling with any of the following?" Here is how they replied.
Terrain
We asked route surveyors to estimate how much of the route goes through different kinds of terrain.
There is no data on how much of this route is on roads
There is no data on how much of this route is lit at night
Thereis no data on amount of route paved
There is no data on muddiness
There is no data on rough ground
There is no data on long grass
Report a problem with this data
1 surveys
Information from verified surveys.
Geography information system (GIS) data
Total length
Maximum elevation
Minimum elevation
Start and end points
Earby
Grid Ref
SD9071746813
Lat / Lon
53.91739° / -2.14282°
Easting / Northing
390,717E / 446,813N
What3Words
wounds.scrambles.continued
Skipton
Grid Ref
SD9891051470
Lat / Lon
53.95933° / -2.01810°
Easting / Northing
398,910E / 451,470N
What3Words
mash.regulator.mingles
Earby | |
---|---|
Grid Ref | SD9071746813 |
Lat / Lon | 53.91739° / -2.14282° |
Easting / Northing | 390,717E / 446,813N |
What3Words | wounds.scrambles.continued |
Skipton | |
---|---|
Grid Ref | SD9891051470 |
Lat / Lon | 53.95933° / -2.01810° |
Easting / Northing | 398,910E / 451,470N |
What3Words | mash.regulator.mingles |
Sorry Land Cover data is not currently available for this route. Please check back later.
review
Mary Oz
22 Nov 2023I walked this from Earby on a dry day but after a fair bit of rain, partly because I like exploring transport heritage, and partly because I was hoping it would be drier underfoot than all the field crossings of EarSki One. It was indeed interesting as well as picturesque, however it wasn’t dry!
Some of the track, especially at the Earby end, was quite well used. Its challenges included a few short but steep paths where the elevated line crossed roads but the bridges have been removed. Also, there was a tall gated barrier fence right across the route, but the gate was not locked, and I have the impression this is its normal state.
The biggest challenge was the amount of water on some sections, particularly where the line goes through a cutting in the middle of the Elslack to Carleton section. There is a section which is fully flooded by a permanent little stream at Railway Plantation. There were worn footpaths around this, slightly up the embankment through the woods.
I discovered the reason for this as I encountered two big Land Rovers pushing their way through the floods. I had a short chat with the someone from Land Rover Experience in one of the cars, he was very friendly. They do a certain amount of maintenance here, in order to enhance the driving experience. They are very aware that people walk here sometimes, and try to keep it pleasant for walkers too.
Most of the rest of the route ran along embankments, with good views of the countryside. There was one section along a concrete road, and another section where it was necessary to cross a couple of fields, but mostly the route is extremely easy to navigate.
Unfortunately, the viaduct over the River Aire has been removed, so it was necessary to walk a bit of road to Carleton, then cross some fields to a subway under the busy A629. The final field was extremely muddy, as caused by cows.
There were some nice “living” railway views along the last section to Skipton Bus Station.
I really enjoyed this route – it was a fun challenge, but I suppose some of the challenges mean I should downgrade its star rating.
There are lots of facilities at either end of the route, and pubs at Elslack and at Carleton, but nothing in the middle section.
And another warning – any route going close to the River Aire in this flood plain area, will risk being flooded after significant rainfall. This also applies to EarSki One.
Share your views about this route, give it a star rating, indicate whether it should be verified or not.
Include information that will be useful to others considering to walk or wheel it.
You can add up to 15 photos.
Other Routes for Earby—Skipton See all Slow Ways
Review this better route and help establish a trusted network of walking routes.
Suggest a better route if it better meets our methodology.
Share your thoughts