RadstockFrome

Radfro two
Verified route

Verified Slow Way

Verified by 100.00% of reviewers

By Brian on 16 Aug 2022


Distance

13km/8mi

Ascent

250m

Descent

247m

Download this route

Are you sure you want to download this route?

Using a GPX file for the first time?

No, back to route

Give a hike

Pledge to walk this route and help firm up its place in the network - every walk helps.

So far it has been reviewed by three people and surveyed by one person and

No other people have pledged to review this route.

Your pledged routes will show up in your pledges Waylist.

Every review and survey pledged and then walked will help make the Slow Ways network better, thank you for your help!

Sign up or log in to pledge to walk this route.

Back to route

Save to Waylist

Sign up or log in to save this route so you can find it more easily or plan a longer journey.

More options

Save to my account

Sign up or log in to save this route so you can find it more easily or plan a longer journey.

Print (via Inkatlas)

Survey this route

Review this route

Suggest a better route

Report a problem

Description

This route largely follows Radfro one, with two changes : based on travelling from Frome to Radstock
a) Rather than descend down a very steep rutted slope on the East Mendip Way into Vallis Vale, this route turns left at ST 75850 48747 down a track, and just before reaching Elm Lane, it turns right onto the Vallis Vale track
b) When Colliers Way track enters Radstock, it now naturally joins Nelson Ward Drive, by continuing straight long this road, it leads straight into Radstock

This route largely follows Radfro one, with two changes : based on travelling from Frome to Radstock
a) Rather than descend down a very steep rutted slope on the East Mendip Way into Vallis Vale, this route turns left at ST 75850 48747 down a track, and just before reaching Elm Lane, it turns right onto the Vallis Vale track
b) When Colliers Way track enters Radstock, it now naturally joins Nelson Ward Drive, by continuing straight long this road, it leads straight into Radstock

Status

This route has been reviewed by 3 people.

There are no issues flagged.

Photos for Radfro two

Photos of this route will appear when they are added to a review. You can review this route here.


Information

Verified route

Route status - Live

Reviews - 3

Average rating -

Is this route good enough? -  Yes (3)

There are currently no problems reported with this route.

Downloads - 27

Surveys

What is this route like?

Surveys are submitted by fellow users of this website and show what you might expect from this Slow Ways route. Scroll down the page to read more detailed surveys.

Grade 3X based on 1 surveys Sign up or log in to survey this route.
Description Note
Grade 3: Route includes rough surfaces that may include small boulders, potholes, shallow ruts, loose gravel, short muddy sections.
Access grade X: At least one stile, flight of steps or other obstacle that is highly likely to block access for wheelchair and scooter users.
Grading is based on average scores by surveyors. This slow way has 1 surveys.
Full grading description

Only people who have completed our training can become Slow Ways surveyors and submit a survey. We do not vet contributors, so we cannot guarantee the quality or completeness of the surveys they complete. If you are dependent on the information being correct we recommend reading and comparing surveys before setting off.

Survey Photos

Facilities

Facilities in the middle third of this route.

Not present at time of survey Public toilet (1)
Not present at time of survey Wheelchair accessible toilet (1)
Not present at time of survey Supermarket (1)
Not present at time of survey Restaurant (1)
Not present at time of survey Vegan restaurant (1)
Not present at time of survey Accommodation (1)
Not present at time of survey Accommodation < £50 (1)
Not present at time of survey Campsite (1)
Not present at time of survey Bothy (1)
Not present at time of survey Free wifi (1)
Not present at time of survey Public phone (1)
Present at time of survey Mobile phone coverage (1)
Not present at time of survey Train station (1)
Present at time of survey Bench (1)
Present at time of survey Picnic table (1)
Not present at time of survey Bus stop (1)
Not present at time of survey Ferry (1)

Challenges

Potential challenges reported on this route. Some challenges are seasonal.

Not present at time of survey Scrambling (1)
Not present at time of survey Wading (1)
Not present at time of survey Swimming (1)
Not present at time of survey Climbing (1)
Not present at time of survey Stepping stones (1)
Maybe present Very slippery (1)
Present at time of survey Very muddy (1)
Not present at time of survey Very icy (1)
Maybe present Likely to flood (1)
Present at time of survey Long grass sections (1)
Maybe present Crops encroaching on path (1)
Not present at time of survey Diverted path (1)

Obstacles

Obstacles on this route.

Present at time of survey Stiles (1)
Present at time of survey Step and kerbs (1)
Not present at time of survey Possible to avoid steps, if applicable (1)
Not present at time of survey Flights of steps (1)
Present at time of survey Gates (1)
Not present at time of survey Kissing gates (1)
Present at time of survey Locked gates (1)
Not present at time of survey Disables access gates (1)
Not present at time of survey Cycle barriers (1)
Not present at time of survey Ladders (1)
Not present at time of survey Cattle grids (1)
Not present at time of survey Fords (1)
Present at time of survey Narrow bridges (1)
Not present at time of survey Ferry required (1)
Present at time of survey Acceptable road walking (1)
Not present at time of survey Unacceptable road walking (1)
Not present at time of survey Dangerous road crossings (1)
Present at time of survey Walking on paths beside roads (1)
Present at time of survey Walking on verges beside roads (1)
Not present at time of survey Railway crossings (1)
Not present at time of survey River crossings (1)
Present at time of survey Cattle possible (1)
Not present at time of survey Horses possible (1)
Not present at time of survey Tidal area (1)
Not present at time of survey Potential falls (1)
Not present at time of survey Exposed to elements (1)
Not present at time of survey Remote area (1)
Not present at time of survey Mountainous area (1)
Not present at time of survey Military training area (1)
Not present at time of survey No visible path (1)
Maybe present Seasonal nesting birds (1)
Not present at time of survey Other hazards (1)

Accessibility

Is this route step and stile free?

Not present at time of survey Free of stiles (1)
Not present at time of survey Free of single steps/kerbs (1)
Present at time of survey Free of flights of steps (1)
Not present at time of survey Free of other obstacles (1)

Measurements

Surveyors were asked to measure the narrowest and steepest parts of paths.

The narrowest part of the path is 75.0cm (1)

The steepest uphill gradient walking East 18.0% (1)

The steepest uphill gradient walking West 20.0% (1)

The steepest camber gradient across the path 5.0% (1)

How clear is the waymarking on the route: Clear (1)

Successfully completed

We asked route surveyors "Have you successfully completed this route with any of the following? If so, would you recommend it to someone with the same requirements?". Here is how they replied.

Present at time of survey Small Pug-sized dog (1)
Maybe present Small Labrador-sized dog (1)
Maybe present Large St. Bernard-sized dog (1)
Not present at time of survey Standard pram (1)
Not present at time of survey Off-road rugged pram (1)
Not present at time of survey Standard wheelchair (1)
Not present at time of survey Off-road rugged wheelchair (1)
Not present at time of survey Standard mobility scooter (1)
Not present at time of survey Off-road rugged mobility scooter (1)

Recommended by an expert

We asked route surveyors "Are you a trained access professional, officer or expert? If so, is this route suitable for someone travelling with any of the following?" Here is how they replied.

Present at time of survey Small Pug-sized dog (1)
Maybe present Small Labrador-sized dog (1)
Maybe present Large St. Bernard-sized dog (1)
Not present at time of survey Standard pram (1)
Not present at time of survey Off-road rugged pram (1)
Not present at time of survey Standard wheelchair (1)
Not present at time of survey Off-road rugged wheelchair (1)
Not present at time of survey Standard mobility scooter (1)
Not present at time of survey Off-road rugged mobility scooter (1)

Terrain

We asked route surveyors to estimate how much of the route goes through different kinds of terrain.

2.0% of the route is on roads (1)

15.0% of the route is lit at night (1)

83.0% of the route is paved (1)

5.0% of the route is muddy (1)

5.0% of the route is over rough ground (1)

1.0% of the route is through long grass (1)

Report a problem with this data

1 surveys

Information from verified surveys.

3X August 2022 by Brian
Read survey

Sign up or log in to get the link to survey this route for Radfro.

Geography information system (GIS) data

Total length

Maximum elevation

Minimum elevation

Start and end points

Radstock
Grid Ref ST6896154772
Lat / Lon 51.29122° / -2.44651°
Easting / Northing 368,961E / 154,772N
What3Words clings.backers.reduction
Frome
Grid Ref ST7764948039
Lat / Lon 51.23109° / -2.32149°
Easting / Northing 377,649E / 148,039N
What3Words gangs.mull.truth

Sorry Land Cover data is not currently available for this route. Please check back later.

reviews


Mockymock

18 Sep 2024 Summer

Good route and I agree with the previous reviewers that this is a better version than the original. A lot of it is easy to navigate and my only moans are some wet and muddy ground along the path by the Egford Brook in the wooded valley south of Bedlam (not a problem today but I bet it is bad in winter) and that there is not much to see along some stretches of the wooded old railway path at the Radstock end, although it is very easy and efficient walking.

I went from Frome to Radstock. The Slow Way heads uphill out of Frome, at first through cobbled pedestrian streets and then along a mostly dull main road for several hundred metres before picking up the East Mendip Way. This exits by a metal field gate on a well-used path by an arable field with a view ahead. It then narrows to a smaller path downhill by some woodland and soon arrives at a metalled road.

Here the Slow Way jinks south to circumvent the steep descent on awkward ground through the woods used by the East Mendip Way. Turn left downhill on the road and when you reach the carparky area at the bottom, turn sharp right back on yourself along the metalled path heading towards the woods (Note if coming the other way that there is a stern sign on the road saying that it is a private road but this looks to be mainly to deter cars).

[[Alternatively, if it is summer and the ground is very dry (as it was today) you could cut out this v-shaped section, cross the road and go straight ahead on the grassy path to head on down through the woods on the East Mendip Way, but it is steep, with some uneven, rocky ground and I wouldn’t recommended it when wet]]

There follows a woodland valley walk by a river. The path varies, starting out good, then reaching a damp section with some muddy dips and then improving again. The poorer section is probably very muddy in winter. Make sure you turn off right through the wooden kissing gate and over the old stone bridge to Bedlam Cottage (I was not concentrating and strode on by for quite a while before I noticed I was the wrong side of the river). Then, at the top of the access road to the cottage, you reach a lively-looking minor road. Look right and you can see the metal kissing gate on the other side which is the ongoing path. From here it is a hop across a field to another quiet road which takes the Slow Way a very short distance to pick up the old railway path (cycle route 24).

The remaining five miles to Radstock is a bit samey but very easy and there are views around into the fields some of the time. There were quite a few people using this multiuser path on a sunny weekend day on foot and on bikes. Eventually it arrives in Radstock via some new housing.

I climbed over one stile and there are some kissing gates. I didn’t encounter any locked gates.

I didn't see any refreshments on the path between the two towns. A couple of pubs are signed off the railway path but the one at Mells is a bit of a way away and the one at Kilmersdon several hundred metres away. Both towns have reasonable bus links and Frome has a railway station although it is a bit of a trek from the town centre to get to it.


Panifex

12 Mar 2023 Winter

I walked this route from Radstock to Frome. The changes Brian has made over the first version of this route are small, but are definite improvements. It was muddy and slippery today so avoiding the very steep section was very useful!

The locked gate that both Brian and I came across last time was not locked this time - I do wonder if we both just missed the not quite obvious latch?

Overall, still a great slow way. An easy, direct path. For me only 4 stars because it doesn’t have that something extra that makes it really special (and has a long stretch on a cycle path, which I find a bit dull…).


Brian

16 Aug 2022 Summer

I undertook this route from Frome to Radstock, after nearly falling down the steep slope into Vallis Vale off the East Mendip Way. It is a easier route into the Vale. The final section in Radstock follows a largely straight line all along Nelson Ward Drive into the centre.
Other than these two changes it is identical to Radfro one.
Both Radfro routes have a lot of pavement, or tarmac track which is easy walking
I would have rated it 5 stars, for the above, but unfortunately there's a 'locked' field gate at ST 75124 49694 which I had to clamber over ( 1 star removed ).

  • JohnMyerson

    JohnMyerson

    21 Mar 2024

    See https://fromesmissinglinks.org.uk/chairs-update-september-23/ for intentions to extend cycle route into Frome. Slow Ways could use some of this now.

  • Share your thoughts

    Please Sign up or log in to comment.


Share your views about this route, give it a star rating, indicate whether it should be verified or not.

Include information that will be useful to others considering to walk or wheel it.

You can add up to 15 photos.

Overall ratings

3 reviews


0 reviews

3 reviews

0 reviews

0 reviews

0 reviews

Show all


Other Routes for Radstock—Frome See all Slow Ways

Radstock—Frome

Radfro one

Distance

12km/8mi

Ascent

194 m

Descent

188 m

Review this better route and help establish a trusted network of walking routes.

Suggest a better route if it better meets our methodology.

See all routes from Radstock.

See all routes from Frome.