Radcliffe-on-TrentBingham

Radbin one
Verified route

Verified Slow Way

Verified by 100.00% of reviewers

Distance

7km/4mi

Ascent

40m

Descent

46m

Download this route

Are you sure you want to download this route?

Using a GPX file for the first time?

No, back to route

Save to Waylist

Sign up or log in to save this route so you can find it more easily or plan a longer journey.

More options

Save to my account

Sign up or log in to save this route so you can find it more easily or plan a longer journey.

Survey this route

Review this route

Suggest a better route

Report a problem

Description

This is a Slow Ways route connecting Radcliffe-on-Trent and Bingham.

Know of a better route? Share it here.

This is a Slow Ways route connecting Radcliffe-on-Trent and Bingham.

Know of a better route? Share it here.

Status

This route has been reviewed by 3 people.

There are no issues flagged.

Photos for Radbin one

Photos of this route will appear when they are added to a review. You can review this route here.


Information

Verified route

Route status - Live

Reviews - 3

Average rating -

Is this route good enough? -  Yes (3)

There are currently no problems reported with this route.

Downloads - 1

Surveys

What is this route like?

Surveys are submitted by fellow users of this website and show what you might expect from this Slow Ways route. Scroll down the page to read more detailed surveys.

Grade 1X based on 1 surveys Sign up or log in to survey this route.
DescriptionNote
Grade 1: Entirely smooth and compacted surfaces.
Access grade X: At least one stile, flight of steps or other obstacle that is highly likely to block access for wheelchair and scooter users.
Grading is based on average scores by surveyors. This slow way has 1 surveys.
Full grading description

Only people who have completed our training can become Slow Ways surveyors and submit a survey. We do not vet contributors, so we cannot guarantee the quality or completeness of the surveys they complete. If you are dependent on the information being correct we recommend reading and comparing surveys before setting off.

Survey Photos

Facilities

Facilities in the middle third of this route.

Public toilet (0)
Wheelchair accessible toilet (0)
Supermarket (0)
Restaurant (0)
Vegan restaurant (0)
Accommodation (0)
Accommodation < £50 (0)
Campsite (0)
Bothy (0)
Free wifi (0)
Public phone (0)
Mobile phone coverage (0)
Train station (0)
Bench (0)
Picnic table (0)
Bus stop (0)
Ferry (0)

Challenges

Potential challenges reported on this route. Some challenges are seasonal.

Scrambling (0)
Wading (0)
Swimming (0)
Climbing (0)
Stepping stones (0)
Very slippery (0)
Very muddy (0)
Very icy (0)
Likely to flood (0)
Long grass sections (0)
Crops encroaching on path (0)
Diverted path (0)

Obstacles

Obstacles on this route.

Stiles (0)
Step and kerbs (0)
Possible to avoid steps, if applicable (0)
Flights of steps (0)
Gates (0)
Kissing gates (0)
Locked gates (0)
Disables access gates (0)
Cycle barriers (0)
Ladders (0)
Cattle grids (0)
Fords (0)
Narrow bridges (0)
Ferry required (0)
Acceptable road walking (0)
Unacceptable road walking (0)
Dangerous road crossings (0)
Walking on paths beside roads (0)
Walking on verges beside roads (0)
Railway crossings (0)
River crossings (0)
Cattle possible (0)
Horses possible (0)
Tidal area (0)
Potential falls (0)
Exposed to elements (0)
Remove area (0)
Mountainous area (0)
Military training area (0)
No visible path (0)
Seasonal nesting birds (0)
Other hazards (0)

Accessibility

Is this route step and stile free?

Free of stiles (0)
Free of single steps/kerbs (0)
Free of flights of steps (0)
Free of other obstacles (0)

Measurements

Surveyors were asked to measure the narrowest and steepest parts of paths.

Narrowest part of path: no data

The steepest uphill gradient East: no data

The steepest uphill gradient West: no data

The steepest camber: no data

We don't have clear data on the waymarking (1)

Successfully completed

We asked route surveyors "Have you successfully completed this route with any of the following? If so, would you recommend it to someone with the same requirements?". Here is how they replied.

Small Pug-sized dog (0)
Small Labrador-sized dog (0)
Large St. Bernard-sized dog (0)
Standard pram (0)
Off-road rugged pram (0)
Standard wheelchair (0)
Off-road rugged wheelchair (0)
Standard mobility scooter (0)
Off-road rugged mobility scooter (0)

Recommended by an expert

We asked route surveyors "Are you a trained access professional, officer or expert? If so, is this route suitable for someone travelling with any of the following?" Here is how they replied.

Small Pug-sized dog (0)
Small Labrador-sized dog (0)
Large St. Bernard-sized dog (0)
Standard pram (0)
Off-road rugged pram (0)
Standard wheelchair (0)
Off-road rugged wheelchair (0)
Standard mobility scooter (0)
Off-road rugged mobility scooter (0)

Terrain

We asked route surveyors to estimate how much of the route goes through different kinds of terrain.

There is no data on how much of this route is on roads

There is no data on how much of this route is lit at night

Thereis no data on amount of route paved

There is no data on muddiness

There is no data on rough ground

There is no data on long grass

Report a problem with this data

1 surveys

Information from verified surveys.

1X May 2022 by StephenWalker
Read survey

Sign up or log in to get the link to survey this route for Radbin.

Geography information system (GIS) Data

Total length

Maximum elevation

Minimum elevation

Start and end points

Radcliffe-on-Trent
Grid RefSK6479239465
Lat / Lon 52.94869° / -1.03715°
Easting / Northing464,792E / 339,465N
What3Wordsargue.whizzed.forehand
Bingham
Grid RefSK7050939953
Lat / Lon 52.95235° / -0.95197°
Easting / Northing470,509E / 339,953N
What3Wordsshort.dummy.titles

Radbin One's land is

Arable 50.3%
Urban 49.7%

Data: Corine Land Cover (CLC) 2018

Reviews


Hugh Hudson

26 Jun 2022

Walked this from Radcliffe to Bingham as the second part of three route walk from West Bridgford to Bottesford.

This is a quick route that is on pavements and surfaced paths throughout, with no stiles, steps or other obstacles. However it is very uninspiring - far too much of it is on the pavement of a busy main road, so it is never quiet. There are other possibilities (for example going via Shelford) but all of them are significantly longer and would probably have more accessibility issues.


StephenWalker

14 May 2022

I walked this route from Bingham. It is along the roadside all the way. It is safe but very noisy. The shortest route but not pleasant !.


Smiglet87

29 Apr 2021

Runs alongside very busy main road, but footpath is wide, continuous and in good condition - I cycle this route regularly. One star deducted for the noise factor, but there aren't any other viable routes.


Share your views about this route, give it a star rating, indicate whether it should be verified or not.

Include information that will be useful to others considering to walk or wheel it.

You can add up to 15 photos.

Overall ratings

3 reviews


0 reviews

1 reviews

1 reviews

1 reviews

0 reviews

Show all


There are no other routes for Radcliffe-on-Trent—Bingham

If you know a better way, then please let us know.

Review this route and help establish a trusted network of walking routes.

Suggest a better route if it better meets our methodology.

See all routes from Radcliffe-on-Trent.

See all routes from Bingham.