High Wycombe — Beaconsfield
Higbea one
Verified Slow Way
Verified by 100.00% of reviewers
Verified Slow Way
Verified by 100.00% of reviewers
By a Slow Ways Volunteer on 07 Apr 2021
Description
This is a Slow Ways route connecting High Wycombe and Beaconsfield.
Know of a better route? Share it here.
This is a Slow Ways route connecting High Wycombe and Beaconsfield.
Know of a better route? Share it here.
Status
This route has been reviewed by 3 people.
There are no issues flagged.
Photos for Higbea one
Photos of this route will appear when they are added to a review. You can review this route here.
Information
Route status - Live
Reviews - 3
Average rating -
Is this route good enough? - Yes (3)
There are currently no problems reported with this route.
Downloads - 15
Surveys
What is this route like?
Surveys are submitted by fellow users of this website and show what you might expect from this Slow Ways route. Scroll down the page to read more detailed surveys.
Grade 4X based on 1 surveys | Sign up or log in to survey this route. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Description | Note | ||
Grade 4: Route includes very rough surfaces including deep ruts, steep loose gravel, unmade paths and deep muddy sections. Wheelchairs may experience traction/wheel spin issues. Access grade X: At least one stile, flight of steps or other obstacle that is highly likely to block access for wheelchair and scooter users. |
Grading is based on average scores by surveyors. This slow way has 1 surveys. | ||
Full grading description |
Only people who have completed our training can become Slow Ways surveyors and submit a survey. We do not vet contributors, so we cannot guarantee the quality or completeness of the surveys they complete. If you are dependent on the information being correct we recommend reading and comparing surveys before setting off.
Survey Photos
Facilities
Facilities in the middle third of this route.
Challenges
Potential challenges reported on this route. Some challenges are seasonal.
Obstacles
Obstacles on this route.
Accessibility
Is this route step and stile free?
Measurements
Surveyors were asked to measure the narrowest and steepest parts of paths.
Narrowest part of path: no data
The steepest uphill gradient East: no data
The steepest uphill gradient West: no data
The steepest camber: no data
How clear is the waymarking on the route: Unclear in places (1)
Successfully completed
We asked route surveyors "Have you successfully completed this route with any of the following? If so, would you recommend it to someone with the same requirements?". Here is how they replied.
Recommended by an expert
We asked route surveyors "Are you a trained access professional, officer or expert? If so, is this route suitable for someone travelling with any of the following?" Here is how they replied.
Terrain
We asked route surveyors to estimate how much of the route goes through different kinds of terrain.
20.0% of the route is on roads (1)
20.0% of the route is lit at night (1)
30.0% of the route is paved (1)
30.0% of the route is muddy (1)
20.0% of the route is over rough ground (1)
5.0% of the route is through long grass (1)
Report a problem with this data
1 surveys
Information from verified surveys.
Geography information system (GIS) data
Total length
Maximum elevation
Minimum elevation
Start and end points
High Wycombe
Grid Ref
SU8691693052
Lat / Lon
51.62958° / -0.74566°
Easting / Northing
486,916E / 193,052N
What3Words
invite.debate.crass
Beaconsfield
Grid Ref
SU9400391137
Lat / Lon
51.61123° / -0.64382°
Easting / Northing
494,003E / 191,137N
What3Words
curiosity.strong.farm
Higbea One's land is
High Wycombe | |
---|---|
Grid Ref | SU8691693052 |
Lat / Lon | 51.62958° / -0.74566° |
Easting / Northing | 486,916E / 193,052N |
What3Words | invite.debate.crass |
Beaconsfield | |
---|---|
Grid Ref | SU9400391137 |
Lat / Lon | 51.61123° / -0.64382° |
Easting / Northing | 494,003E / 191,137N |
What3Words | curiosity.strong.farm |
Arable | 20.6% |
Pasture | 12.4% |
Urban | 66.1% |
Woods | 1.0% |
Data: Corine Land Cover (CLC) 2018
reviews
Swebbews
23 Aug 2023We walked this route from Beaconsfield to High Wycombe on a warm summer's afternoon, and thoroughly enjoyed it. I'd endorse the comments made by the previous reviewers about turning off the A40 London Road sooner onto Kingsmead Rec, and taking care on the short section without a footpath on Hammersley Lane under the railway bridge. The changing landscapes made the walk interesting and varied, and it is well suited to be included in the Slow Ways network.
Martin McGovern
08 May 2023I walked from Beaconsfield to High Wycombe. The route isn't recommended for anything wheeled - too many obstructions (stiles, kissing gates) and some short steep muddy sections. But it presents a nice range of landscape: urban alleys, forest, farmland, and on the run-in to High Wycombe, quite a long section beside water along the Wye valley.
The previous reviewer is correct that the lower part of Hammersley Lane doesn't have a footpath, though I should add that it's a pretty short section.
-
Share your thoughts
Ianschagen
30 Apr 2021The main drawback of this route is walking along the London Road (A40), as well as the lower part of Hammersley Lane with no footpath. This can be avoided by going into Kingsmead rec and following the north edge by the river. At the end of the rec join the Chiltern Way, got past Kingsmead Business Park and cross the A40, bearing left to go up a lane under the railway line, and then follow the Chiltern Way up to and through Wycombe Heights golf course.
This route largely follows the Chiltern Way and then the Berkshire Loop, and is easy to navigate with good country paths and alleyways (‘jitties’) through the suburbs of Beaconsfield.
-
Share your thoughts
Share your views about this route, give it a star rating, indicate whether it should be verified or not.
Include information that will be useful to others considering to walk or wheel it.
You can add up to 15 photos.
There are no other routes for High Wycombe — Beaconsfield
If you know a better way, then please let us know.
Review this better route and help establish a trusted network of walking routes.
Suggest a better route if it better meets our methodology.
Share your thoughts