Cobham (Elmbridge) — Oxshott
Coboxs two
Slow Way not verified yet. Verify Coboxs here.
Slow Way not verified yet. Verify Coboxs here.
By TC on 07 Jun 2021
Description
This is a reasonable route between Cobham and Oxshott. It is mostly traffic free and on footpaths. The crossings of Leigh Hill Rd and of Fairmile Rd are both a bit limited in visibility and can be difficult
This is a reasonable route between Cobham and Oxshott. It is mostly traffic free and on footpaths. The crossings of Leigh Hill Rd and of Fairmile Rd are both a bit limited in visibility and can be difficult
Status
This route has been reviewed by 2 people.
There are no issues flagged.
Photos for Coboxs two
Photos of this route will appear when they are added to a review. You can review this route here.
Information
Route status - Live
Reviews - 2
Average rating -
Is this route good enough? - Yes (2)
There are currently no problems reported with this route.
Downloads - 2
Surveys
We are working to build-up a picture of what routes look like. To do that we are asking volunteers to survey routes so that we can communicate features, obstacles and challenges that may make a route desirable or not.
Slow Ways surveyors are asked to complete some basic online training, but they are not vetted. If you are dependent on the survey information being correct in order to complete a route, we recommend that you think critically about the information provided. You may also wish to wait until more than one survey has been completed.
Help people know more about this route by volunteering to submit a survey.
- Complete the survey training.
- Submit a survey for this route.
Geography information system (GIS) data
Total length
Maximum elevation
Minimum elevation
Start and end points
Cobham (Elmbridge)
Grid Ref
TQ1080560098
Lat / Lon
51.32919° / -0.41098°
Easting / Northing
510,805E / 160,098N
What3Words
brands.tiny.traps
Oxshott
Grid Ref
TQ1458360517
Lat / Lon
51.33221° / -0.35665°
Easting / Northing
514,583E / 160,517N
What3Words
cakes.ranks.pints
Cobham (Elmbridge) | |
---|---|
Grid Ref | TQ1080560098 |
Lat / Lon | 51.32919° / -0.41098° |
Easting / Northing | 510,805E / 160,098N |
What3Words | brands.tiny.traps |
Oxshott | |
---|---|
Grid Ref | TQ1458360517 |
Lat / Lon | 51.33221° / -0.35665° |
Easting / Northing | 514,583E / 160,517N |
What3Words | cakes.ranks.pints |
Sorry Land Cover data is not currently available for this route. Please check back later.
reviews
JohnMyerson
08 Jul 2023A straightforward walk between Cobham centre and Oxshott (I used the station). Much of the footpaths are between fences so no views. There is no need to divert off Littleheath Road (as in Coboxs one) as the pavement is continuous. To reach the station instead of Oxshott village just continue straight on along the heath.
Derick Rethans
18 Jun 2023I walked this on a warm, slightly haze morning, from Oxshott (station) to Cobham. It had not rained significantly for several weeks.
It is a quite reasonable route. I missed the bit between the start at Oxshott and the station, but I have walked that with other routes so I know it's fine. The best part is through the woods at Oxshott itself (photo #1). Then there are some paths along residential roads (photo #2). Lots of the footpaths in this short route are however hemmed in by fences, from Fairmile Lane to Cedar Road, which is less nice (photos #4, #5, #6, #7, #8). The paths were well kept and not overgrown, which I sort of expected to be the case. The only slightly hairy point was actually crossing Fairmile Lane, and being confronted with a big gate (#photo 3) — it's a public footpath, but no cycling or driving. The clock tower at Cobham marks the finish.
-
Share your thoughts
Share your views about this route, give it a star rating, indicate whether it should be verified or not.
Include information that will be useful to others considering to walk or wheel it.
You can add up to 15 photos.
Other Routes for Cobham (Elmbridge)—Oxshott See all Slow Ways
Review this better route and help establish a trusted network of walking routes.
Suggest a better route if it better meets our methodology.
Share your thoughts