Description
Very similar to Chisid Two but picks up Daisy's suggestion of a less main road-y approach to Sidcup station, using the path though Morrison's car park. This also has the benefit of crossing Sidcup High Street at a good point for coffee shops etc. I changed the routing at Chislehurst to reduce the amount of time along the busy Bromley Lane. The route across Scadbury Park is the same as Chisid Two, this path does get pretty muddy in winter, but is always passable with good boots
Very similar to Chisid Two but picks up Daisy's suggestion of a less main road-y approach to Sidcup station, using the path though Morrison's car park. This also has the benefit of crossing Sidcup High Street at a good point for coffee shops etc. I changed the routing at Chislehurst to reduce the amount of time along the busy Bromley Lane. The route across Scadbury Park is the same as Chisid Two, this path does get pretty muddy in winter, but is always passable with good boots
Status
This route has been reviewed by 2 people.
There are no issues flagged.
Photos for Chisid three
Photos of this route will appear when they are added to a review. You can review this route here.
Information
Route status - Live
Reviews - 2
Average rating -
Is this route good enough? - Yes (2)
There are currently no problems reported with this route.
Downloads - 1
Surveys
What is this route like?
Surveys are submitted by fellow users of this website and show what you might expect from this Slow Ways route. Scroll down the page to read more detailed surveys.
| Grade 4X based on 1 surveys | Sign up or log in to survey this route. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Description | Note | ||
| Grade 4: Route includes very rough surfaces including deep ruts, steep loose gravel, unmade paths and deep muddy sections. Wheelchairs may experience traction/wheel spin issues. Access grade X: At least one stile, flight of steps or other obstacle that is highly likely to block access for wheelchair and scooter users. |
Grading is based on average scores by surveyors. This slow way has 1 surveys. | ||
| Full grading description | |||
Only people who have completed our training can become Slow Ways surveyors and submit a survey. We do not vet contributors, so we cannot guarantee the quality or completeness of the surveys they complete. If you are dependent on the information being correct we recommend reading and comparing surveys before setting off.
Survey Photos
Facilities
Facilities in the middle third of this route.
Challenges
Potential challenges reported on this route. Some challenges are seasonal.
Obstacles
Obstacles on this route.
Accessibility
Is this route step and stile free?
Measurements
Surveyors were asked to measure the narrowest and steepest parts of paths.
The narrowest part of the path is 60.0cm (1)
The steepest uphill gradient walking East 9.0% (1)
The steepest uphill gradient walking West 9.0% (1)
The steepest camber gradient across the path 2.0% (1)
How clear is the waymarking on the route: Unsigned (1)
Successfully completed
We asked route surveyors "Have you successfully completed this route with any of the following? If so, would you recommend it to someone with the same requirements?". Here is how they replied.
Recommended by an expert
We asked route surveyors "Are you a trained access professional, officer or expert? If so, is this route suitable for someone travelling with any of the following?" Here is how they replied.
Terrain
We asked route surveyors to estimate how much of the route goes through different kinds of terrain.
There is no data on how much of this route is on roads
There is no data on how much of this route is lit at night
Thereis no data on amount of route paved
There is no data on muddiness
There is no data on rough ground
There is no data on long grass
Report a problem with this data
1 surveys
Information from verified surveys.
Geography information system (GIS) data
Total length
Maximum elevation
Minimum elevation
Start and end points
Chislehurst
Grid Ref
TQ4440070175
Lat / Lon
51.41221° / 0.07500°
Easting / Northing
544,400E / 170,175N
What3Words
emerge.shapes.walks
Sidcup
Grid Ref
TQ4632872634
Lat / Lon
51.43382° / 0.10372°
Easting / Northing
546,328E / 172,634N
What3Words
forum.head.crash
| Chislehurst | |
|---|---|
| Grid Ref | TQ4440070175 |
| Lat / Lon | 51.41221° / 0.07500° |
| Easting / Northing | 544,400E / 170,175N |
| What3Words | emerge.shapes.walks |
| Sidcup | |
|---|---|
| Grid Ref | TQ4632872634 |
| Lat / Lon | 51.43382° / 0.10372° |
| Easting / Northing | 546,328E / 172,634N |
| What3Words | forum.head.crash |
Sorry Land Cover data is not currently available for this route. Please check back later.
reviews
Strider
20 Feb 2026I walked from Sidcup to Chislehurst on a drizzly day.
Agree with Jane Taylor, a good walk. Urban roadside walking beginning and end with lots of green space in-between.
Well routed through the underpass, slopes of 9%, the steepest on-route.
After a very wet January and early February, Scadbury Nature Reserve was lovely but muddy, very muddy. Manageable, but a bit of a slippery slog. Good boots needed and poles advised. Quite different in Summer I'd imagine.
Jane Taylor
16 Mar 2025Walked Sidcup to Chislehurst. Good route making the most of green spaces, especially Scadbury Park.
Stopped for coffee at Sidcup High Street.
Scadbury Park had some very muddy paths but with walking boots and poles they didn’t cause much trouble. And the parts that weren’t muddy were lovely. A carved teddy bear picnic in the woods was the highlight (photo).
Chislehurst had some refreshment options but I caught a bus and didn’t try them out.
The Chislehurst meeting point is on a patch of grass with a ‘keep off the grass’ sign next to it.
For me this route works better than Chisid Two because it has less main road. I deducted a star mostly because mud.
-
Share your thoughts
Share your views about this route, give it a star rating, indicate whether it should be verified or not.
Include information that will be useful to others considering to walk or wheel it.
You can add up to 15 photos.
Other Routes for Chislehurst—Sidcup See all Slow Ways
Review this better route and help establish a trusted network of walking routes.
Suggest a better route if it better meets our methodology.
Share your thoughts