Chadwell St Mary — Stanford-le-Hope
Chasta one
Slow Way not verified yet. Verify Chasta here.
Slow Way not verified yet. Verify Chasta here.
By a Slow Ways Volunteer on 07 Apr 2021
Description
This is a Slow Ways route connecting Chadwell St Mary and Stanford-le-Hope.
Know of a better route? Share it here.
This is a Slow Ways route connecting Chadwell St Mary and Stanford-le-Hope.
Know of a better route? Share it here.
Status
This route has been reviewed by 1 person.
This route has been flagged (1 time) for reasons relating to safety.
Photos for Chasta one
Photos of this route will appear when they are added to a review. You can review this route here.
Information
Route status - Live
Reviews - 1
Average rating -
Is this route good enough? - No (1)
Problems reported - Safety (1)
Downloads - 8
Surveys
We are working to build-up a picture of what routes look like. To do that we are asking volunteers to survey routes so that we can communicate features, obstacles and challenges that may make a route desirable or not.
Slow Ways surveyors are asked to complete some basic online training, but they are not vetted. If you are dependent on the survey information being correct in order to complete a route, we recommend that you think critically about the information provided. You may also wish to wait until more than one survey has been completed.
Help people know more about this route by volunteering to submit a survey.
- Complete the survey training.
- Submit a survey for this route.
Geography information system (GIS) data
Total length
Maximum elevation
Minimum elevation
Start and end points
Chadwell St Mary
Grid Ref
TQ6453778519
Lat / Lon
51.48170° / 0.36819°
Easting / Northing
564,537E / 178,519N
What3Words
goods.oppose.rear
Stanford-le-Hope
Grid Ref
TQ6822282281
Lat / Lon
51.51441° / 0.42300°
Easting / Northing
568,222E / 182,281N
What3Words
pints.begun.rift
Chasta One's land is
| Chadwell St Mary | |
|---|---|
| Grid Ref | TQ6453778519 |
| Lat / Lon | 51.48170° / 0.36819° |
| Easting / Northing | 564,537E / 178,519N |
| What3Words | goods.oppose.rear |
| Stanford-le-Hope | |
|---|---|
| Grid Ref | TQ6822282281 |
| Lat / Lon | 51.51441° / 0.42300° |
| Easting / Northing | 568,222E / 182,281N |
| What3Words | pints.begun.rift |
| Arable | 49.3% |
| Other | 11.3% |
| Pasture | 3.2% |
| Urban | 36.2% |
Data: Corine Land Cover (CLC) 2018
review
Daisy C
08 Jan 2024Unfortunately this route is blocked in 2 places. First traversable with difficulty navigating and gloves plus secateurs required for the many brambles. Which I luckily had with me, warned by lack of use on Strava heat maps! Second was impenetrable thorny thicket beyond a stile. The amount of pruning time was prohibitive and it looked like thorny species. There is also walking across a muddy field with unrestored path Possibly due to extreme wet weather but tyre tracks elsewhere and difficulty traversing adjacent sections casts doubt on this. Plus unpleasant/unsafe road walking which I looked at then avoided using obvious, if unwelcoming, footpaths. And later a new off road shortcut where a golf course has been converted to public parkland. Went well off course and used this too as the route had truly failed already.
See small map for locations, although the text labels need some interpretation as positioning stretched on saving the screenshot.
Flag raised for safety - the road walking. Blockages are potentially fixable.
Along the way I found some fascinating jewel brain fungus, a sand martin colony and Cladonia lichen population which balanced out the frustration. Will post an alternative route, which also has imperfections but was usable with care and determination.
Share your views about this route, give it a star rating, indicate whether it should be verified or not.
Include information that will be useful to others considering to walk or wheel it.
You can add up to 15 photos.
Other Routes for Chadwell St Mary—Stanford-le-Hope See all Slow Ways
Review this better route and help establish a trusted network of walking routes.
Suggest a better route if it better meets our methodology.
Share your thoughts