Birkenhead — Liverpool

Birliv two
Verified route

Verified Slow Way

Verified by 100.00% of reviewers

By Hiking Historian on 25 Jun 2021

Distance

4km/3mi

Ascent

53m

Descent

31m

Download this route

Are you sure you want to download this route?

Using a GPX file for the first time?

No, back to route

Give a hike

Pledge to walk this route and help firm up its place in the network - every walk helps.

So far it has been reviewed by four people and surveyed by two people and

No other people have pledged to review this route.

Your pledged routes will show up in your pledges Waylist.

Every review and survey pledged and then walked will help make the Slow Ways network better, thank you for your help!

Sign up or log in to pledge to walk this route.

Back to route

Save to Waylist

Sign up or log in to save this route so you can find it more easily or plan a longer journey.

More options

Save to my account

Sign up or log in to save this route so you can find it more easily or plan a longer journey.

Print (via Inkatlas)

Survey this route

Review this route

Suggest a better route

Report a problem

Description

Reroute of Birliv One, with more practical route in Birkenhead

Reroute of Birliv One, with more practical route in Birkenhead

Status

This route has been reviewed by 4 people.

There are no issues flagged.

Photos for Birliv two

Photos of this route will appear when they are added to a review. You can review this route here.

Information

Verified route

Route status - Live

Reviews - 4

Average rating -

Is this route good enough? -  Yes (4)

There are currently no problems reported with this route.

Downloads - 4

Surveys

What is this route like?

Surveys are submitted by fellow users of this website and show what you might expect from this Slow Ways route. Scroll down the page to read more detailed surveys.

Grade 1X based on 2 surveys Sign up or log in to survey this route.
Description Note
Grade 1: Entirely smooth and compacted surfaces.
Access grade X: At least one stile, flight of steps or other obstacle that is highly likely to block access for wheelchair and scooter users.		 Grading is based on average scores by surveyors. This slow way has 2 surveys.
Full grading description

Only people who have completed our training can become Slow Ways surveyors and submit a survey. We do not vet contributors, so we cannot guarantee the quality or completeness of the surveys they complete. If you are dependent on the information being correct we recommend reading and comparing surveys before setting off.

Survey Photos

Facilities

Facilities in the middle third of this route.

Present at time of survey Public toilet (2)
Present at time of survey Wheelchair accessible toilet (2)
Present at time of survey Supermarket (2)
Present at time of survey Restaurant (2)
Present at time of survey Vegan restaurant (2)
Present at time of survey Accommodation (2)
Present at time of survey Accommodation < £50 (2)
Not present at time of survey Campsite (2)
Not present at time of survey Bothy (2)
Present at time of survey Free wifi (2)
Present at time of survey Public phone (2)
Present at time of survey Mobile phone coverage (2)
Present at time of survey Train station (2)
Present at time of survey Bench (2)
Not present at time of survey Picnic table (2)
Present at time of survey Bus stop (2)
Present at time of survey Ferry (2)

Challenges

Potential challenges reported on this route. Some challenges are seasonal.

Not present at time of survey Scrambling (2)
Not present at time of survey Wading (2)
Not present at time of survey Swimming (2)
Not present at time of survey Climbing (2)
Not present at time of survey Stepping stones (2)
Not present at time of survey Very slippery (2)
Not present at time of survey Very muddy (2)
Not present at time of survey Very icy (2)
Not present at time of survey Likely to flood (2)
Not present at time of survey Long grass sections (2)
Not present at time of survey Crops encroaching on path (2)
Not present at time of survey Diverted path (2)

Obstacles

Obstacles on this route.

Not present at time of survey Stiles (2)
Present at time of survey Step and kerbs (2)
Possible to avoid steps, if applicable (0)
Not present at time of survey Flights of steps (2)
Not present at time of survey Gates (2)
Not present at time of survey Kissing gates (2)
Not present at time of survey Locked gates (2)
Not present at time of survey Disables access gates (2)
Not present at time of survey Cycle barriers (2)
Not present at time of survey Ladders (2)
Not present at time of survey Cattle grids (2)
Not present at time of survey Fords (2)
Not present at time of survey Narrow bridges (2)
Present at time of survey Ferry required (2)
Not present at time of survey Acceptable road walking (2)
Not present at time of survey Unacceptable road walking (2)
Not present at time of survey Dangerous road crossings (2)
Not present at time of survey Walking on paths beside roads (2)
Not present at time of survey Walking on verges beside roads (2)
Not present at time of survey Railway crossings (2)
Not present at time of survey River crossings (2)
Not present at time of survey Cattle possible (2)
Not present at time of survey Horses possible (2)
Not present at time of survey Tidal area (2)
Not present at time of survey Potential falls (2)
Not present at time of survey Exposed to elements (2)
Not present at time of survey Remote area (2)
Not present at time of survey Mountainous area (2)
Not present at time of survey Military training area (2)
Not present at time of survey No visible path (2)
Not present at time of survey Seasonal nesting birds (2)
Not present at time of survey Other hazards (2)

Accessibility

Is this route step and stile free?

Present at time of survey Free of stiles (2)
Not present at time of survey Free of single steps/kerbs (2)
Present at time of survey Free of flights of steps (2)
Present at time of survey Free of other obstacles (2)

Measurements

Surveyors were asked to measure the narrowest and steepest parts of paths.

Narrowest part of path: no data

The steepest uphill gradient East: no data

The steepest uphill gradient West: no data

The steepest camber: no data

How clear is the waymarking on the route: Clear (2)

Successfully completed

We asked route surveyors "Have you successfully completed this route with any of the following? If so, would you recommend it to someone with the same requirements?". Here is how they replied.

Present at time of survey Small Pug-sized dog (2)
Present at time of survey Small Labrador-sized dog (2)
Present at time of survey Large St. Bernard-sized dog (2)
Present at time of survey Standard pram (2)
Present at time of survey Off-road rugged pram (2)
Present at time of survey Standard wheelchair (2)
Present at time of survey Off-road rugged wheelchair (2)
Present at time of survey Standard mobility scooter (2)
Present at time of survey Off-road rugged mobility scooter (2)

Recommended by an expert

We asked route surveyors "Are you a trained access professional, officer or expert? If so, is this route suitable for someone travelling with any of the following?" Here is how they replied.

Present at time of survey Small Pug-sized dog (2)
Present at time of survey Small Labrador-sized dog (2)
Present at time of survey Large St. Bernard-sized dog (2)
Present at time of survey Standard pram (2)
Present at time of survey Off-road rugged pram (2)
Present at time of survey Standard wheelchair (2)
Present at time of survey Off-road rugged wheelchair (2)
Present at time of survey Standard mobility scooter (2)
Present at time of survey Off-road rugged mobility scooter (2)

Terrain

We asked route surveyors to estimate how much of the route goes through different kinds of terrain.

65.0% of the route is on roads (2)

82.5% of the route is lit at night (2)

65.0% of the route is paved (2)

There is no data on muddiness

There is no data on rough ground

There is no data on long grass

Report a problem with this data

2 surveys

Information from verified surveys.

1X June 2021 by Hiking Historian
Read survey
1X June 2021 by Hiking Historian
Read survey

Sign up or log in to get the link to survey this route for Birliv.

Geography information system (GIS) data

Total length

Maximum elevation

Minimum elevation

Start and end points

Birkenhead
Grid Ref SJ3221088473
Lat / Lon 53.38874° / -3.02076°
Easting / Northing 332,210E / 388,473N
What3Words elder.poker.pigs
Liverpool
Grid Ref SJ3502190540
Lat / Lon 53.40767° / -2.97892°
Easting / Northing 335,021E / 390,540N
What3Words twice.email.bleak

Sorry Land Cover data is not currently available for this route. Please check back later.

reviews

Dannywith

12 Apr 2024 Spring
Report

A unique city centre and urban SlowWay, which requires the use of the Mersey Ferry.

I've not much to add that hasn't already been covered in previous reviews, however given the cost of the crossing can be expensive during the off-peak hours, a potentially cheaper option could be to buy a combined bus, train & boat ticket (the Saveaway ticket) for £6.80, which whilst not valid at all times, can present a healthy saving.

  • Ken

    Ken

    14 Jun 2024

    Crossing water see https://slowways.zendesk.com/hc/en-gb/community/posts/19532917678109-Crossing-water

  • Share your thoughts

    Please Sign up or log in to comment.

Mary Oz

05 Sep 2022 Summer
Report

The route through Liverpool is excellent, through some of the main shopping streets, and down to the waterfront. The streets are wide, pedestrianised, fully accessible, and buzzing. There is a flight of stairs soon after leaving Lime Street Station which can be avoided by following the slope straight after the first road crossing.
The ferry crossing is great fun, with fab views of the Liverpool skyline. It is also fully accessible. Currently a standard single fare in the weekday rush hour periods is £2.90. Outside these hours, however, it is necessary to pay the tourist cruise rate, £11.50 if no concessions, which gives a longer return route with commentary, but you can break the journey and get on and off at both ports. Both ports have full facilities.
The route through Birkenhead is fairly tedious but functional. There are some kerbs, spoiling the full accessibility of the route. The plus point is the interest of seeing one of the Mersey Tunnel entrances from quite close up, including going right over the mouth of it.

  • Ken

    Ken

    14 Jun 2024

    Crossing water see https://slowways.zendesk.com/hc/en-gb/community/posts/19532917678109-Crossing-water

  • Share your thoughts

    Please Sign up or log in to comment.

Mtormey

19 Feb 2022 Winter
Report

Really solid route.

I was racing to catch the ferry (check timetables in advance!), so I only took in the Birkenhead side of the route at a jogger’s pace, but from what I experienced it was direct, accessible, and (most important) ACCURATE!

The ferry ‘cross the Mersey is iconic, of course, though a bit pricey.

The Liverpool side was great, taking you through the main shopping centre. Anything you could possibly need you could find here! I love Liverpool.

Full marks.

Hiking Historian

25 Jun 2021 Summer
Report

More practical Birkenhead route than previous. Still necessary to take ferry, so timing is essential. All areas are accessible, and passes through main shopping areas between railways stations.

  • Ken

    Ken

    14 Jun 2024

    Crossing water see https://slowways.zendesk.com/hc/en-gb/community/posts/19532917678109-Crossing-water

  • Share your thoughts

    Please Sign up or log in to comment.

Share your views about this route, give it a star rating, indicate whether it should be verified or not.

Include information that will be useful to others considering to walk or wheel it.

You can add up to 15 photos.

Overall ratings

4 reviews

2 reviews

2 reviews

0 reviews

0 reviews

0 reviews

Show all

Other Routes for Birkenhead—Liverpool See all Slow Ways

Birkenhead—Liverpool

Birliv one

U U

Distance

4km/3mi

Ascent

43 m

Descent

28 m

Review this better route and help establish a trusted network of walking routes.

Suggest a better route if it better meets our methodology.

See all routes from Birkenhead.

See all routes from Liverpool.